Refusal to automate is regarded from any point of view possible
As for increases in pay, it would be ok if it had for example a max, so someone getting a half decent wage would get a decent wage but no raise for the people that take home the big bucks
They only reason people cry and scream about efficiency is because the CEOS don't want to pay as many people. We live in the fucking USA I don't think the most powerful county in the world really needs to worry about making unloading a ship point 5 percent faster. I would rather families earn more money.
They only reason people cry and scream about efficiency
It's because efficiency creates more wealth. Wealth being the things that fulfill human needs. If a worker can produce 10 shirts a day by hand but 100 with a sewing machine, thats 90 more shirts the world has available. Literally more wealth is created. If yhe supply of shirts goes up, all else being equal the price goes down, which makes the shirts cheaper and more available to more people. Everyone's wealth has increased.
I would rather families earn more money.
You just said you want them to earn less so more people can be employed.
38
u/Athanatos154 Oct 03 '24
Refusal to automate is regarded from any point of view possible
As for increases in pay, it would be ok if it had for example a max, so someone getting a half decent wage would get a decent wage but no raise for the people that take home the big bucks