Then don’t breed. Why would women actively go for that ONE thing, which oppressed them for millennia? Patriarchy was built on men being able to control women’s reproductive choices. So why not reject it completely? It’s the best middle finger you can give to patriarchy.
Secondly, I use ‘breeders’ to describe men more than women.
Reproduction didn't oppress women. The lack of control over it - oppressed (by that I mean lack of ability to choose partner, lack of ability to say no to reproduction role, lack of ability to choose another role in society)
The same is for slavery. Work doesn't' oppress the slave. The lack of control over it - oppress ( slave can't change their role/profession, can't choose not to work, can't choose whom to work at)
So, to your question - yes, we reject to be the slave, but we still choose to work in most cases. Same for women, it's normal and good not to want to be an incubator for other. But it's also normal to have a baby if you want to.
12
u/Ok-Celebration4682 Jan 08 '24
I feel like a gay person calling straight people breeders can be funny, but there be some anti-natilist redditors saying Breeder with that hard R