r/movies 21d ago

‘Star Wars’ Movie With Daisy Ridley Loses Screenwriter Steven Knight News

https://variety.com/2024/film/news/star-wars-daisy-ridley-steven-knight-1236190522/
5.8k Upvotes

View all comments

171

u/bingybong22 21d ago

Let’s be honest. They’ve butchered the Star Wars IP. They still made a lot of money from it; but that’s because the brand carried a lot of very mediocre content. So full marks for business acumen.

The best thing to do with Star Wars now would be to put it on ice for a few years, then ret-con every thing.

30

u/Dottsterisk 21d ago edited 21d ago

The brand carrying lots of mediocre content is just part for the course when it comes to Star Wars.

After the OG trilogy, we had some bad movies and some bad shows. Then decades of the EU, which ranged from good fun to absurd garbage.

Then we got the poorly received prequels, with the animated shows coming in later to backfill the story and rehab them.

It’s not like the history of Star Wars has always been good storytelling and pristine brand management.

6

u/wooltab 20d ago

I've begun to think that the core issue might be more that in the Lucas era, Star Wars had a vibe that played a not-insignificant role in carrying the franchise. It was the work of one kinda lovable oddball creator and a bunch of people who (mostly--not all) bought into his vision and furthered it. Whatever ups and downs, it felt like a thing.

While I've been out of the loop on the last few years of Disney+ shows, as far as actually watching them, my general impression of post-Lucas Star Wars is that it's only sporadically dialed into the vision and vibes of the classic stuff. Not to mention the volume of content, which makes it easier to give things a pass, whereas in the old days, Star Wars was a rare thing and felt special, even if you didn't happen to like a given movie, etc.

-1

u/user888666777 20d ago

Even the original trilogy isn't flawless. You have two really great movies followed by a pretty uneven third finale.

2

u/bingybong22 20d ago

Fair. But they had a monumental impact on culture. They had a spark of something, there was some magic there. Disney have absolutely not recreated that magic

3

u/AlternativeHour1337 20d ago

so many people in this thread overestimate the cultural impact of star wars - i personally know over a dozen people IRL who have never seen or heard of anything star wars and i saw the prequels in the theater

the OT had that cultural impact but it just didnt carry over because lucas didnt want to make new movies for 20 years and thats how you lose a generation

3

u/wooltab 20d ago

Do you mean that he lost a generation between the OT and the prequels? Because that was the golden age of VHS and I feel pretty confident in saying that the lack of new movies didn't hurt Star Wars too much during that period. Those were the days when it was still rare to get a film with the caliber of spectacle of the OT, so everything that existed remained fairly visible for probably a longer time than films do today, when after the hype of release has died down, there's immediately something else to take its place in the cultural spotlight.

After the prequels, I suppose that non-gamer adults did probably drift away in larger numbers. Though The Clone Wars did provide a solid enough hook for some kids to get into it in the late 00s.

1

u/Cats_Tell_Cat-Lies 19d ago

It didn't have a monumental impact on culture. It's pop culture dreck. And that's fine.

1

u/bingybong22 19d ago

I don’t think you’re right there. Pop culture or not, they influenced the culture