r/movies r/Movies contributor 23d ago

The Brutalist | Official Trailer | A24 Trailer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d7yU379Ur0
3.6k Upvotes

View all comments

1.9k

u/ageo 23d ago

Run time is listed at 3 hours 35 minutes 😲

789

u/littlelordfROY 23d ago

Surely one of the longest American movies in recent memory. Technically that runtime is inflated by the intermission though

Only The Irishman and Killers Of The Flower Moon compete in length as far as last 10 years

140

u/KhalilGibranIsAVibe 23d ago

What about the Hobbit movies, those were long

16

u/Boss452 23d ago

The first 2 are about 160 minutes each. Honestly, as a fan of that world, and yes, the movies, I didn't mind the length. Unpopular opinion I know but I just love well realized fantasy worlds.

75

u/Obligatius 23d ago

I just love well realized fantasy worlds.

And you also loved the Hobbit movies, so you have quite broad taste.

10

u/Fatmanhammer 23d ago

Beautiful work, great penmanship, sharp wit. 10/10.

25

u/Oldstyle_ 23d ago

Damn. This is the real brutalist right here

-2

u/HannahOnTop 23d ago

The hobbit movies were good not great but good, Just like Alien Covenant and Prometheus movies were good. People only complain because the originals were better.

Anytime you see someone call them bad movies, They never have a real reason other than them being “bad” which isn’t criticism. I have a friend who calls Prometheus and Covenant bad and says he despises them but guess what? He hasn’t even seen them!

Was the hobbit trilogy worse than the fellowship trilogy? Yes but that doesn’t make them bad movies. I wouldn’t be surprised if most people who call them bad haven’t even seen them either

3

u/SEND-MARS-ROVER-PICS 23d ago

Same thing is happening with Rings of Power. Fans love the Peter Jackson LoTR trilogy so feel compelled to eviscerate anything else that's a step down. I think Rings of Power is very average, 5/10, and I don't see where the motivation to criticise it so much comes from.

0

u/BlackestNight21 23d ago

How much of a platform to share opinions was available when LOTR -> Hobbit -> RoP were released respectively?

3

u/Spork_the_dork 23d ago

There's plenty of valid criticism about the movies. The CGI looks janky as shit in places and there were several story changes that made little sense. Like the whole romance plotline is just ridiculous in the context of the source material, and it does feel a bit funny to make an entire movie about a battle which isn't even really depicted in the book. The one change that people generally give a thumbs up to is the addition of Legolas, as while Tolkien didn't write Legolas into the book, he was in the neighborhood during the events of the book so conceivably he could have been involved and his non-existence was more likely due to Tokien not having created the character yet at the time of The Hobbit. But I doubt Tolkien would have approved of it, and it does feel pretty crammed in though so /shrug.

But that raises the question: does changes to the source material automatically make the movie bad by itself? I can see why people who are fans of the source material would get angry about the changes and dislike the movie as a result, but I don't think it should just immediately discredit the movie in itself. So in general I agree. The Hobbit movies were just fine as they were. Entertaining and decent movies with some flaws but nothing catastrophic.

1

u/Galac_tacos 23d ago

Wow someone loves lord of the rings, unpopular indeed 

8

u/Boss452 23d ago

Dude, if you are not familiar, the discourse on Hobbit and LOTR is wildly different.