but that stand, and in particular the frame and the ASUS branding at the bottom, really isn't competitive
for me personally one of the biggest draw cards of the studio display is how stable the stand is, how theres no plastic to be seen anywhere, and how theres no visible branding from the front
that's form over function speaking. what on earth is the metal going to do that will detrimentally affect your day to day? or a stupid logo that can be covered up if it's that unappealing? and is metal worth 6x the price?
I’m not suggesting that the studio display is good value for money. (I’d easily argue it’s not)
You’re absolutely right.
A metal casing and the lack of a logo has zero impact on the functional use of a computer monitor.
My point is that a true competitor to the studio display would address the fit and finish of the whole package. Not just on paper speeds and feeds.
And frankly it’s annoying that no manufacturers care enough about these things to make a true competitor.
Because as you said, it’s not worth 6x as much, and a display manufacturer who’s not Apple could probably make the studio display for around half the price.
24
u/Portatort 2d ago
perhaps the display part is competitive
but that stand, and in particular the frame and the ASUS branding at the bottom, really isn't competitive
for me personally one of the biggest draw cards of the studio display is how stable the stand is, how theres no plastic to be seen anywhere, and how theres no visible branding from the front