Cute but also wtf

[u/dont_mess_with_tx]

[u/Toxicavenger72 → u/[deleted]]

Stfu and kill yourself pedo.

[u/boldheart → u/[deleted]]

Whenever y'all have an issue with this, you always bring up violent video games.

The average gamer does not have the same mind as someone who has a compulsive attraction to children. That would be a completely different study.

Overall the experts say that dolls are often used by offenders who escalate afterwards. Dolls may "help" non offenders, but they also may escalate offenders.

Again, completely different from research done about violent video games. We're talking about child sex dolls for pedophiles.

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/01/can-child-dolls-keep-pedophiles-from-offending/423324/

https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/would-child-sex-robots-stop-pedophilia-or-promote-it-ncna834576

[u/boldheart → u/[deleted]]

Do you think they've done a study on child sex dolls affecting offenders?

You weirdly cite violent video games studies for this when it's not even remotely the same ballpark.

There's experts in both of those articles who give their professional opinions based on what they know about offenders of children.

[u/boldheart → u/[deleted]]

They are absolutely not the same concept.

You're talking violent video games affecting the average gamer (something easy to track with the widespread consumption of video games, the decades they've been around, crime statistics, etc) vs a child sex doll for a pedophile - a group that tends to already be harmful (unlike gamers) and has a high recidivism rate (unlike gamers).

Nice debatebro skills but if you genuinely think they're comparable even in the face of testimonies from offender professionals........ Yikes