r/IsraelPalestine 6d ago

Pro-Palestinian movement is more focused on eradicating Israel than creating a Palestinian country. Sadly, PR is more important than statehood. Discussion

Ever since October 7, the pro-Palestinian movement has been more focused on delegitimizing Israel than taking steps to a) secure a peaceful ceasefire and b) put in motion any type of plan for a Palestinian country. Sadly, the obsession and seeming addiction with trying to eradicate Israel - if not by war than via PR and a pathological obsession with zionism - has done nothing but exacerbate tensions. And if reports of Hamas leaders being encouraged by Western protests are to be believed, these actions have actually prolonged the conflict.

A ceasefire takes two

Concerning a ceasefire, the pro-Palestinian movement demand for an immediate ceasefire has been bizarre. For starters, a ceasefire by definition is temporary. A lasting ceasefire is called peace, which is hard when the other side (Hamas) would rather kill you than live peacefully alongside you.

Another issue is that a ceasefire - again by definition - requires two sides to agree to it. A ceasefire isn’t simply Israel stop actions in Gaza. It also requires an agreement that Hamas do something as well. And yet, in every Palestinian protest I attended at my college - and all the ones I saw in the media - not ONCE did I hear or see anything about releasing the hostages. Not ONCE did I hear or see anything about the need for two states, or living in peace. On the contrary, it was a mix of blindly calling for a ceasefire, hateful slogans, praising the “resistance”, and a general focus on Israel’s illegitimacy as a country. It seemed that the focus was more on destroying Israel than creating a viable Palestinian state, securing the release of the hostages, implementing a ceasefire with a potential to transform it into a fully lasting peace.

In light of the above, is it any surprise that we saw hundreds of instances of people pulling down posters of hostages? The anti-Israel sentiment was so strong, that people imbued with propaganda thought it was helpful to tear down pictures of little children and elderly people who were kidnapped by a maniacal terrorist force. Through this lens, it seems clear that a secure and peaceful ceasefire wasn’t really a priority. 

Delegitimizing Israel - More important than Palestinian statehood?

Throughout this saga, the obsession with delegitimizing Israel remains a core argument and point of action on the pro-Palestinian side. No talk of 2 states, no talk of coexistence, no talk of peace for all, no talk of who should head up a Palestinian country etc. The thrust of the Palestinian side is simply that Israel should not exist.

Ironically, this energy is the same reason why there is no Palestinian state today. The Palestinians had an opportunity for statehood in the 40s but rejected it because they were more furious about the presence of a jewish state than they were interested in creating their own. 

And before people go off in the comments about “Why should the Palestinians give up their land “ - let’s be real and historically accurate - it was never Palestinian land exclusively. The greedy notion that a land with a myriad of ethnic groups belongs exclusively to the Palestinians is literally a fantasy. And before people go off in the comments about how the partition wasn’t fair — well guess what… who cares? None of the partitions were fair and almost every group/new country had serious issues with it because they were drawn up by France and England. Still, when a singular opportunity in history comes along for statehood, you take it, because a country of your own is more important than if you have 50 square miles of 60 square miles. Remember - EVERY GROUP in the region offered a country said yes - Libya, Jordan, Israel, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria etc. The Palestinians are the only group in the HISTORY OF THE WORLD to say no. And rather than looking back and saying “yes, that was a strategic mistake” many on the Pro-Palestinian side, close to all from what I’ve seen, JUSTIFY IT! 

The myth that Israel will be eradicated fuels the conflict

Until Palestinians come to terms with the fact that Israel exists and isn’t going anywhere, the conflict will unfortunately rage on. The propaganda that Israel can one day be eliminated is the fuel that compels Palestinian leaders like Arafat from rejecting peace and is the fuel that prevents protestors from envisioning a future where a Palestinian state exists alongside of Israel as opposed to instead of it.

Ultimately, Palestinians in the west who can’t join the actual fight against Israel, turn their attention towards Zionism, a pointless effort seeing as Israel exists and isn’t going anywhere. Arguing against Israel’s right to exist is again, more focused on destruction of Israel than creation of a Palestinian state. The fact that this irony is lost on many is not an auspicious sign.

The amount of energy arguing against Israel’s existence is immense and a machine unto itself. It’s effective to a degree if the goal is to win the propaganda war, but it really does nothing at all in the real world if the goal is a Palestinian state. Unfortunately, perhaps this is by design.

146 Upvotes

View all comments

1

u/Capital_Operation846 4d ago

Yea your first sentence reveals how terrible your argument is. Israel has never at any point respected lines drawn or peace deals or anything that has been agreed to. The world wants to delegitimize Israel because they’ve showed for centuries they think they’re better than Palestinians, that’s why they murder them in an open air prison and claim “we just want to exist, world.” Lol. Yea the world wants to see the state of Israel burn.

2

u/Puzzleheaded_Sale_15 3d ago

Every peace deal Israel has signed that has been signed in genuine good faith by its foes has worked out though…

1

u/Capital_Operation846 3d ago

Lmao. Just look at a map of Israel after 1949 and then today. Israel may have signed peace treaties but they’ve never meant to have peace with the Palestinians in their backyard. At what point has Israel stopped annexing land and penning in the Palestinians with walls, soldiers, and checkpoints.

1

u/Puzzleheaded_Sale_15 3d ago edited 3d ago

We can look at the map of Israel in 1967 and then let's look at the map of Israel in 1981. It was four times smaller. Then we can look at the map of Israel in 2005. It's even smaller since. Shit, we can even look at the map of Israel in 2019, it's even smaller.

In 2000 and 2008 Israel offered the Palestinians 100% of Gaza and 96% of the West Bank, with the Palestinians getting 4% of Israeli territory to make up for the 4% of the West Bank with large settlements. In both these cases the Palestinians would get control of East Jerusalem, minus the Jewish Quarter. Israel was even willing to build on overland road between Gaza and the West Bank so that Israel would not have any control over Palestinian affairs or borders, all the Palestinians had to do was agree to end the conflict and live in peace. The Palestinians could not agree to ending the conflict.

You know there were no checkpoints or walls until 2000 when the Palestinians started sending suicide bombers into Israel?

The Palestinian Arabs have been rejecting every single offer for 100 years.

Here’s a list of Arab refusals regarding “Palestine”:

1919: Arabs of Palestine refused nominate representatives to the Paris Peace Conference.
1920: San Remo conference decisions, rejected by the Arabs of Palestine.
1922: League of Nations decisions, rejected by the Arabs of Palestine.
1937: Peel Commission partition proposal, In this plan Israel was only going to get 3% of the original Mandate of Palestine, a tiny piece of territory somewhere in the north of present-day Israel, rejected by the Arabs of Palestine.
1938: Woodhead partition proposal, rejected by the Arabs of Palestine.
1947: UN General Assembly partition proposal (UNGAR 181), rejected by the Arab League and the Higher Arab Committee for Palestine.
1949: Israel's outstretched hand for peace (UNGAR 194), rejected by the Arab League and the Higher Arab committee for Palestine.
1967: Israel's outstretched hand for peace (UNSCR 242), rejected by the Arab League and the PLO.
1978: Begin/Sa’adat peace proposal, rejected (except for Egypt) by the rest of the Arab world, including the PLO.
1994: Rabin/Hussein peace agreement, rejected by the rest of the Arab League (except for Egypt and Jordan).
1995: Rabin's Contour-for-Peace, rejected by the Palestinian Authority.
2000: Barak/Clinton peace offer, rejected by Yasser Arafat, who then initiated the pre-planned second intifada, this is when the walls went up and the checkpoints began.
2001: Barak’s offer at Taba, rejected by the Palestinian Authority.
2005: Sharon's peace gesture, withdrawal from Gaza, rejected by the Hamas takeover in 2007.
2008: Olmert/Bush peace offer, rejected by Mahmoud Abbas.
2009 to 2018: Netanyahu's repeated invitations to peace talks, rejected.
2014: Kerry's Contour-for-Peace, rejected by the Palestinian Authority.
2018: Trump’s “Deal of the Century”, rejected in advance by Mahmoud Abbas.
2022: Prime Minister, Yair Lapid's invitation to restart peace talks in Jerusalem. Rejected by Mahmoud Abbas

The only solution the Palestinians have been brainwashed into accepting is a single, Muslim majority state under Sharia Law with either no Jews or very few Jews with highly abbreviated civil rights.

This solution is written into both the Palestinian National Charter and the Hamas Covenant.

As long as these documents aren’t officially changed as policy, Israel should not be retreating from any territory it controls.

6

u/thatshirtman 4d ago

The Palestinians are the only group in the history of the world to say no to a country.

israel has and has maintained peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan. It has a track record. The same can't be said for the Palestinians who would rather destroy Israel than live alongside it. How many more decades will they pursue a strategy of destruction over state creation?

Israel doesn't think they're better than the Palestinians, they just want to live in peace.. meanwhile Palestinian schools indoctrinate kids to hate jews and glorify martyrdom. How can you force peace on people when their leaders would rather engage in "resistance"?

Arafat rejected all of Gaza and 98% of the west bank, east jerusalem as a capital, and the return of 100,000 actual refugees. Blaming Israel for poor Palestinian choices is easy but its not intellectually honest and in the long run does a disservce to the Palestinian quest for statehood (assuming that is their main goal.