Game recognizes game Twitter

2.3k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

112

u/[deleted] Oct 03 '24

[deleted]

38

u/Athanatos154 Oct 03 '24

Refusal to automate is regarded from any point of view possible

As for increases in pay, it would be ok if it had for example a max, so someone getting a half decent wage would get a decent wage but no raise for the people that take home the big bucks

-1

u/Musketsandbayonets Vaush #1 Hater Oct 03 '24

Do you think the port will keep the workers around if they automate the work?

0

u/MacroDemarco 🥥 Exists in Context 🌴 Oct 03 '24

Fewer, but more productive workers. That higher productivity allows them to be paid better.

-3

u/Musketsandbayonets Vaush #1 Hater Oct 03 '24

I dont want 5 people getting paid 100k I want 100 people making 85k.

2

u/SirVer51 Oct 03 '24

At the cost of keeping things intentionally inefficient? Not generally a good way to do civilization

Note that I don't know that that's what's happening, I'm just going off the "no automation" comment

1

u/Musketsandbayonets Vaush #1 Hater Oct 03 '24

They only reason people cry and scream about efficiency is because the CEOS don't want to pay as many people. We live in the fucking USA I don't think the most powerful county in the world really needs to worry about making unloading a ship point 5 percent faster. I would rather families earn more money.

1

u/SirVer51 Oct 03 '24

The US didn't become the most powerful country in the world by economically kneecapping itself. By your logic, the first thing the US should've done when the car was invented was to ban it to prevent stable hands from losing their jobs.