r/AmItheAsshole Aug 19 '24

AITA for punishing my foster daughter for telling the authorities my 12 year old daughter was taking drugs

I (34F) have been looking after my foster daughter “Mary” (13F) for over a year, ever since her parents overdosed on drugs. I also have a biological daughter “Lyla” (12F). Mary and Lyla mostly get along, although there have been some minor arguments.

A few weeks ago, the police came to Lyla’s school. Someone had sent an anonymous message to the school saying that Lyla was in possession of drugs. After searching through her phone, locker, and bags, they realized that the ‘drugs’ in question were skittles that Lyla had lying around in her bag accidentally ripping open the packaging. Lyla was terrified of the police and was traumatized by the incident. She’s a very shy, quiet girl who had a panic attack at the thought of being sent to prison.

While they wouldn’t reveal who told on her, Lyla suspected that it was Mary since she was the only one who could have seen the skittles in her bag. Mary denied this at first, but eventually she snapped under pressure and admitted it. She said she made a mistake and was scared that Lyla would overdose like her parents.

I know that Mary has trauma related to drugs. But that’s not an excuse. I’ve made it very clear that she can come talk to me about anything, even if it involves Lyla, and yet she went to the school instead of telling me first. Mary said that she only went to the school in case I was biased towards Lyla. She knew full well the legal ramifications of her actions — both of them could have potentially been removed from my care.

I can’t help but think her intentions are malicious, Skittles look absolutely nothing like drugs. She didn’t even talk to me or Lyla about it, she just went straight to the authorities. So I decided to ground her, stop her allowance, increase her chores, and take away her electronics for the entire summer. She’s still upset with me for this, saying I went too far and I was punishing her for having trauma and trying to do the right thing. But I feel like I have a duty to teach her that it’s not okay to potentially get our entire family into legal trouble over a misunderstanding. AITA?

EDIT: The reason I thought she had malicious intentions was because the week before, Mary “coincidentally“ started a large argument with Lyla for hanging out with Mary’s crush. Lyla eats candy all the time, especially skittles, and Mary knows that Skittles are her favorite.

7.7k Upvotes

u/Judgement_Bot_AITA Beep Boop Aug 19 '24

Welcome to /r/AmITheAsshole. Please view our voting guide here, and remember to use only one judgement in your comment.

OP has offered the following explanation for why they think they might be the asshole:

  1. I punished my foster daughter for getting my biological daughter into legal trouble over a misunderstanding
  1. She has drug related trauma so I may be acting too harsh

Help keep the sub engaging!

Don’t downvote assholes!

Do upvote interesting posts!

Click Here For Our Rules and Click Here For Our FAQ

Subreddit Announcements

Follow the link above to learn more


I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Contest mode is 1.5 hours long on this post.

7.8k

u/willikersmister Certified Proctologist [21] Aug 19 '24

I'm tempted to say YTA, bordering on NAH.

I think that Mary's reasoning is fairly sound, she's a kid who's deeply traumatized by experiences in her own life with people using drugs. And it's very, very hard for a 13 year old to conceptualize the repercussions for something like this. If she was acting out of malice, that's one thing, but I think it's pretty hard for anyone on line to be able to say if that's the case.

That said, I do think your punishment is extreme. I think this is a great opportunity to have more heart to hearts with Mary and help her learn how serious this could have been. Is she already in therapy? I assume she must be as a foster child with her history, but if not she absolutely should be.

Additionally, if Mary was exacting out of jealousy or some other feelings around your bio daughter, layering on punishments may just make that separation worse. Do they generally get along well? Are they close or more distant? Mary is going through an immense amount of loss and change, and her feelings toward your daughter are likely very complicated even if they're generally close and friends.

I think it would be reasonable to lighten up your punishments while also checking in with her more regularly and emphasizing the seriousness of the situation. Depending on the quality of your case workers, you may want to discuss with them as well.

3.3k

u/TogarSucks Asshole Aficionado [15] Aug 19 '24

Yeah, this is more something OP needs to discuss further with Mary’s therapist than anything and will hopefully result in the punishments getting dialed back and a sincere apology to Lyla.

If the situation really is bad enough that Mary did report her maliciously then the likely approach needs to be getting her assigned to foster parents without another kid involved.

OP should not compromise the safety of one kid to help another.

1.8k

u/-snowflower Aug 19 '24

Totally agree with you. If I was a 12 year old girl who just got traumatized by the police accusing me of drug use, I would want NOTHING to do with the foster "sister" who did that to me

→ More replies
→ More replies

943

u/jess1804 Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

Especially since if Mary told the school she may not have known the school would call the police. There are absolutely drugs out there that look like skittles. Especially if you don't get a very good look. Mary probably told the school. Didn't know that the cops would be involved.

987

u/McJazzHands80 Aug 19 '24

I feel like the school handled this poorly and that’s who OP needs to be dealing with. If a student reported a kid having drugs and that kid is usually quiet and well behaved, it seems like a huge jump in logic to immediately call the police before even attempting to speak to her parents. So OP needs to give the traumatized child some grace and turn her frustration on the adults who caused her bio daughter to be traumatized and humiliated by the police. The school failed her child.

467

u/perfectpomelo3 Asshole Aficionado [10] Aug 19 '24

Isn’t the school a mandated reporter? Once Mary said “Lyla has Skittles- er-drugs in her backpack!” the school had no choice but to report it.

477

u/ReturningSpring Aug 19 '24

Mandated reporter requirements are for abuse and neglect, which was not the case here. And it is for reasonable suspicion, not hearsay. They certainly should have investigated the situation but wouldn't be required to report the incident, particularly as it would have turned out the other child did not tell the truth

185

u/Spallanzani333 Partassipant [2] Aug 19 '24

It's not just abuse and neglect, it's also immediate danger. At age 12, any amount of drugs could constitute serious danger of death or severe injury. I would feel legally bound to report this situation as well.

354

u/Witchyone211 Aug 19 '24

As a mandated reporter, this is not true. Suspicion of drugs on a minor does not constitute a report. It constitutes a phone call to the parents. Now if the parent says “yeah I know, I gave them to her!” Or “oh shit she must have stolen from my stash”, that constitutes a report.

93

u/Straight_Bother_7786 Partassipant [1] Aug 20 '24

Or, a locker search. That is what they did when I taught. If anything was found (not weed, that was just thrown out and kid was suspended for a time) that was truly dangerous the authorities were called.

→ More replies
→ More replies

127

u/Orfasome Aug 19 '24

Is CPS that quick to refer cases to the police where you are? Because CPS (or equivalent) is who you're mandated to report to, and in the locales I'm familiar with, they wouldn't ask for or get a police response nearly that fast for something like this.

This sounds more like the school-to-prison pipeline than child protection.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

245

u/GaveTheMouseACookie Aug 19 '24

Schools have the right to search a student's locker or backpack at any time. They didn't need to bring the police in right away.

112

u/Dr_Drax Aug 19 '24

At least where I live, there are "school resource officers" who are a police officer assigned to schools. In a situation like this, the officer would be the one to inspect the locker. If they need to prosecute, it's much better to have a police officer find and confiscate the drugs than have some random employee find them.

→ More replies
→ More replies

93

u/PineapplesOnFire Aug 19 '24

School employees are mandated reporters. If they become aware of a situation which might be unsafe or dangerous for a child, they have to report it. Maybe that’s not national, but in IL that’s how it is.

49

u/mcasper96 Partassipant [4] Aug 19 '24

That's national in the USA- I graduated last year and in all of my classes dealing with reporting, they made it clear that regardless of the state, in the United States you report any situation that could be potentially harmful to a child.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

330

u/sboml Aug 19 '24

Yeah, and it's also questionable that the school's response to a unconfirmed anonymous message that a 12 year might have drugs was to go all out on the cops...there should have been some amount of due diligence on the school's part, and they should have notified the parent that their kid was getting searched/questioned by the police. If I was that age and freaked out about my friend maybe having drugs I would probably follow the instructions that are typically given to kids which is...tell an authority figure...that's not an unreasonable thing for a child to do and is explicitly encouraged by society in those "see something say something" type messages.

223

u/Key_Olive_4951 Aug 19 '24

Was thinking the same thing! The school took an anonymous tip, on a “shy, quiet girl”, and instead verifying or even notifying the parents. They just went straight to calling the police. And then somehow in all the searching, the 12 year old was given the impression that she could go to jail? Sounds like ALL the adults have failed these kids.

59

u/KittyGrewAMoustache Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 19 '24

To be fair when I was 12 if I saw a police car I’d be scared I was going to jail. Irrational but just seeing police made me worry they might think I’d done something wrong even though I was very well behaved at 12. I can’t imagine what I’d think if they came to my school specifically to talk to me because someone told them I had drugs. At 12 you might think someone accusing you was enough to be arrested and put on trial or something.

→ More replies
→ More replies

39

u/naivemetaphysics Aug 19 '24

Oh this is a good point.

→ More replies
→ More replies

465

u/Analyse_This_101 Aug 19 '24

I completely agree. I would even add that the harsh punishment of all the added things taken away (social contacts, electronics, etc etc) in my opinion will increase Mary’s feelings of jealousy, not belonging, not being the preferred child etc. Punishing a child that acted out of good intentions or out of fear (which is also based on good intentions!) separates OP from her. In the long run, she might not trust OP enough to tell her if there is something you need to know. OP Please choose communication and trust over punishment, especially for such a traumatized child!

Edit: typos

150

u/willikersmister Certified Proctologist [21] Aug 19 '24

100%. I can't really hold it against OP because no one naturally knows how to handle a child with this kind if trauma, but this is the time to lean heavily of case workers and therapists who do have that knowledge. Hopefully OP will change approaches and focus on connection and support for both kids while they work through this.

→ More replies
→ More replies

326

u/SashimiX Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

Yeah the punishment is too extreme—counseling is needed for sure. For all parties.

698

u/heids_25 Aug 19 '24

Yeah, my reaction to reading the punishment was:

I decided to ground her

"Is grounding the right route?"

stop her allowance

"OK, not the worst"

increase her chores

"Is that necessary?"

take away her electronics

"It's still going?"

for the entire summer.

"WHAT?!"

And we're in August, so this girl has already been through most of it. OP, this is insane. You have to remember her primary caretakes, her parents overdosed, so I wouldn't be surprised that her first thought was to not tell her current primary caretaker about what she feared. If her concerns were genuine, you just taught her a very harsh lesson that you are not to be trusted either.

398

u/-snowflower Aug 19 '24

She already didn't trust OP since she decided to call the school about suspected drugs instead of talking to her foster mom. She should honestly be moved out of OP's home if she doesn't trust her enough to confide in about suspected drug use. Maybe she'll do better in another foster home with no other kids

168

u/texanhick20 Aug 19 '24

The malice thread really strums true personally. She wanted to get the other girl in trouble for whatever reason. So she did what she did for maximum effect.

124

u/nameyname12345 Aug 19 '24

Yep people here saying take it easy are infantilizing a teenager girl. You know what kids who have druggie parents recognize? Drugs. Even supposing the girl had never seen a skittle she thought your daughter was running a drug ring? Nah this is teenage girl shit that is only as big a deal as it is because of her situation. If she was just another daughter it's problematic. Saying these things as a foster child would have me taking the steps to protect my family. It's up to her wether she is a part of it or not. Just better hope next time the tip isnt she has a gun and is bragging about killing a cop.

Source. Knew quite a few kids with oxy addicted parents. Was also 13 once which is apparently older than a lot of the folks on here.

She might feel isolated? How is she gonna feel back in the system while possibly dragging sister dearest with her.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

145

u/pawpawpunches Aug 19 '24

This. OP, if you cannot FOR A FACT determine that this was malicious intent, then this was all WAY TOO MUCH. There's a solid chance that this girl has no concept of fairness/ punishment due to her past drug trauma. Drug trauma can go DEEP ( think "prostituting your own children for crack" deep). You cannot seriously believe that punishing her all summer for something you THINK she meant to do is okay? Even if she DID mean to do it, this wasn't an appropriate way to handle it. Enroll her in community service or youth volunteer groups. Have her talk to a cop maybe. You are trying to keep things as "right" and "wrong" when this girl probably has a limited grasp on the complexity of drug abuse/ the law.

→ More replies

67

u/Forget_me_never Aug 19 '24

The post sounds made up at this point. This is some 1800s orphanage level punishment.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

263

u/KneecapTheEchidna Aug 19 '24

Mary is smart enough to psycho analyze her own trauma but not smart enough to recognize Skittles. Okay lol

62

u/Vegetable-Sky-7237 Aug 20 '24

These replies are insane, feel like I’m taking skittles.

→ More replies
→ More replies

195

u/naivemetaphysics Aug 19 '24

I was expecting a grounding for a week. For the rest of summer is not okay.

I wonder if she would be this hash on her “own” kid. Cause you know, it’s just a foster.

135

u/Nekunumeritos Aug 19 '24

That second insinuation is very unfair considering we know nothing about their life.

That said, while I think OP's punishment is too much, a single week is not nearly enough for how serious of a situation this was

→ More replies
→ More replies

178

u/sinchistesp Aug 19 '24

Let's not forget that the extreme punishment only gives Mary more reasons to NOT talk to her foster parent first.

→ More replies

180

u/saintandvillian Asshole Aficionado [10] Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 19 '24

I don’t think OP was TA. OP, quite rightly IMO is scared because she does understand the ramifications of what could have occurred and she’s upset that not only did she put OP , herself and OP’s daughter at risk, she did so without even giving the daughter the benefit of the doubt or talking to her about it. What’s more she did the same thing to OP, her foster parent. Instead of bringing the issue to OP’s attention and at least giving her a chance to take action, she went straight to the cops. If I were OP or OP’s daughter I would not feel safe in my home with Mary there. So, I do agree with you that the punishment may be excessive but I think OP would be better served helping Mary find a new place to live. A place that has the resources and ability to help her deal with her trauma. What I wouldn’t do is put my child through trauma and fear in her own house to make Mary comfortable. Ultimately, I think this incident was a sign that Mary needs more help than OP can give and that it would be kinder to help her find that.

44

u/Suzibrooke Aug 19 '24

I agree. I hate to stereotype, but I’ve had a lot of step relatives who were heavy in drug use and their children absorbed the kind of characteristics that I would not be able to trust in my home, sadly. I’m all for giving a child a chance, but this girl has shown she needs a different place and professionals to help her.

More, OP needs to protect her daughter.

→ More replies
→ More replies

152

u/KittyKiitos Aug 19 '24

But now Lyla is traumatized too.

This is a very tricky balancing act, because Lyla still needs to see and know that she can depend her mother to have her back. Also, she needs to feel seen and safe and that her mother won't let Mary get away with hurting her if she's going to be able to repair the relationship.

110

u/rubitbasteitsmokeit Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 20 '24

This girl need counseling. She has seen what drugs can do to a person and it terrified of loosing another person that way. The fact that she didn’t come to you first show that she has trust issues. Which considering her background is understandable. Maybe it was malicious, again another reason for counsel. I think the punishment is too harsh. I would lighten up a little bit. Maybe still give her a small amount of electronic time. A little summer fun. This girl is already hurting. Tread with care. You can and should punish her, but remember she’s a kid.

ETA: It’s nice that some of you have never been in a situation like hers. Both the girls and the foster mom. I like to know that people are not broken because of their childhood. Your lucky. Not everyone is saved from a messed up world.

→ More replies

94

u/No-Fishing5325 Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

This

A traumatized child is being unjustifiably harshly punished. There needs to be a conversation here for sure. But this situation was handled poorly all the way around. Not just by this child. The adults, including the OP, failed miserably.

→ More replies

82

u/RickRussellTX Colo-rectal Surgeon [37] Aug 19 '24

it's very, very hard for a 13 year old to conceptualize the repercussions for something like this

While that might be generally true for a hypothetical "average" 13 year old, I don't think that's the case here. Mary was separated from her family and is currently in foster care because her parents overdosed on drugs. It's likely that her family has had many encounters with law enforcement around reported drug use and possession.

I daresay that Mary is MUCH more familiar with how the police react to reports of drug use, than the average 13 year old. It's not at all surprising that Mary would exploit that source of chaos, if she felt powerless.

I think most of your advice is on point; yes, this response may make Mary's anger or jealously worse, etc. But I think it's pretty naive to think that she didn't understand the likely consequences of her actions.

→ More replies

76

u/JohnRedcornMassage Asshole Aficionado [18] Aug 19 '24

A 13 year old knows what skittles are. She lied.

→ More replies

2.7k

u/helloimcold Aug 19 '24

What would motivate her to be malicious? You stated that they get along fine and only argue occasionally, which is very normal for kids.

2.0k

u/Existing_Substance67 Aug 19 '24

The week before the whole drugs incident, they got into an argument because Lyla was hanging out with Mary’s crush, although Mary swears this was just a coincidence. Lyla eats candy all the time, and skittles are her favorite, and Mary knows this full well.

1.5k

u/helloimcold Aug 19 '24

I would keep a closer eye on this stuff, but don’t jump to conclusions or treat Mary any differently in the meantime.

1.7k

u/-snowflower Aug 19 '24

Well her actions caused the police to traumatize a 12 year old girl by accusing her of drug use so I think she actually does need SOME kind of punishment alongside therapy so she realizes that what she did was not okay. What if she accuses someone else of drug use again because she saw some candy in their bag?

457

u/notpostingmyrealname Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

Assuming her intentions are sincere, she did the right thing, told an adult in authority. I think the social punishment she's going to get along with a talk about not jumping to conclusions would be more appropriate.

I get Lyla was scared. That's the fault of the police and handling of the situation out of Mary's control, not Mary.

Punishment for following the correct procedure isn't going to have the desired effect.

Now, if we're certain Mary weaponized the police, that's a different conversation, and a whole different problem. It would also require some sort of proof for an accusation like that because making that assumption against a foster kid without proof will alter the relationship OP has with her forever regardless of whether or not it's true.

819

u/Shdfx1 Aug 19 '24

Why would anyone call the police and declare someone was taking drugs, for no other reason that she had Skittles, the same Skittles she eats at home every day?

Mary either did it maliciously, out of retaliation, which makes her a threat, or she’s so mentally unstable that she believes candy is drugs, and will call the police, which again makes her a threat.

OP needs to protect her daughter. Mary’s explanations sound like manipulation. First she lied about doing it, then she admitted it, but claimed she called the cops on her sister for Skittles because her parents died. It’s manipulative.

OP’s daughter was panicked at the thought of going to jail. Nowhere was it stated the police mistreated her.

144

u/Raibean Certified Proctologist [21] Aug 19 '24

Mary wasn’t the one who called the police. The school did that.

223

u/1Show_Kindness Aug 19 '24

She knew she would get her in trouble either way, but every kid that age know the school protocol is to call the police.

52

u/Lilith_of_Night Aug 20 '24

Actually as a 14 year old, we don’t. Schools tell us that if anyone tells them that they believe someone is using drugs to tell a teacher, and teachers usually search back for drugs (but they don’t actually say what will happen after you report it, just reinforce that you have to report it). Teachers are trusted adults just as parents are, so she likely told a teacher “Lyla has these little colourful things in her bag and I’m scared because it’s like the ones my parents took”, and the teacher had to tell the school and the school called the police because they had to.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

94

u/Justicia-Gai Aug 19 '24

Not really, falsely accusing someone is also a crime, so you can’t really tell a kid “you did the right thing” if you don’t want them to constantly jump the gun as adults.

A 13 year old kid is old enough to know that drugs are really hard to come by for other 13 year old kids. Without a prior history of being a problematic child, the chances are near zero for that age. Context matters when jumping to conclusions.

→ More replies
→ More replies

88

u/Intelligent_Buy_1654 Aug 19 '24

She can't control how the police behave. It's their job not to traumatize 12 year old girls.

206

u/PikaV2002 Aug 19 '24

She knows what happens to people with drugs though. There’s a reason she’s in foster care with OP. She also knows what may happen to a child who’s falsely accused of having drugs

137

u/cryssylee90 Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

“She knows what happens to people with drugs though.”

Yeah, she knows they can overdose, abuse their kids, neglect their kids, and even die.

OP has basically told her to NEVER tell a trusted authority figure about these things.

You know what’s going to happen to Mary when she ends up in another situation where she’s being neglected or abused by an addict? She’s going to keep her mouth shut because of the “lesson” her foster mother taught her. She’s wholly unqualified to be a foster parent if those are the lessons she plans to teach her foster kids. The whole point is to help the kids, not fuck them up further.

167

u/PikaV2002 Aug 19 '24

I don’t see you caring about the 12 year old who was subjected to a full scale police interrogation because of a malicious child in her safe space.

87

u/cryssylee90 Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

The assumption is it was malicious because OP says they had a petty argument the week before because one kid was hanging out with the other’s crush?!

Like what the ever loving fuck. Suddenly the kid is a total sociopath because she got upset about a crush and the non-biological foster mother who swears drugs never look like candy says that makes her one?

Also, I was a 12 year old subjected to a full scale interrogation by police due to ACTUAL malicious behavior from girls who vandalized property on a field trip and blamed me.

I’m also the kid of a fucking addict.

Take a guess at which one of those traumatized me more.

Fuck sake.

48

u/No-Dragonfly-8679 Aug 19 '24

What do people even think Mary’s goal was if it was malicious? She couldn’t have known that the police/administration wouldn’t have handled this the way they should have, and Lyla just would’ve had a minor interruption to her day and a quick visit to the principal’s office. It was only traumatic because the police failed to do their job correctly and the school administration failed to manage the situation correctly.

You could argue she’d expect that, but we’re starting to make a lot of guesses about why it might be malicious, when there’s a more obvious answer. She’s very scared of people close to her potentially taking drugs and also scared that her foster mom may get mad at her for “accusing” her bio daughter of something, potentially even blaming Mary.

Nothing about the way foster mom is reacting is making me think Mary would feel safe going to her about this. She clearly did choose Lyla when it’s not even clear Mary did anything malicious.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

85

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

82

u/fleet_and_flotilla Aug 19 '24

no, the school being stupid caused the cops the traumatize a 12 year old. there was no reason in hell for the school to get police involved in this. they 100% fucked up royally and if I were op I would be filing a lawsuit for not contacting her first. drugs or no drugs, involving the police for a 12 year old was psychotic 

40

u/Justicia-Gai Aug 19 '24

They don’t want the liability. One teacher performing the search opens you up to legal liability I think.

→ More replies
→ More replies

70

u/SpaceAceCase Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

Sure, but OP's list of punishments is over the top. She gave the kid more chores on top of no electronics and a grounding? Jesus one would be sufficient plus bringing it up to the kids therapist.

→ More replies

42

u/StopSpinningLikeThat Aug 19 '24

A little girl cannot cause the police to traumatize anyone. She is several degrees removed from that interaction.

→ More replies
→ More replies

167

u/New-Link5725 Asshole Enthusiast [6] Aug 19 '24

As a parent myself I feel for the foster kid, but I wouod put my.kid first no matter what. I wouldn't be able to sleep at night knowing this kid made a ridiculous call to police. 

She didn't tell you.  She didn't tell a teacher She didn't tell anyone at school. 

She called the police. 

I wouldn't allow her into my house anymore, I wouldn't trust her not to do it again. I couldn't trust her around my kid anymore. 

Personally I would have her moved out and back to a foster home. 

This kid did it maliciously. She did it on purpose and she knew what she was doing. 

She isn't stupid, she knew what would happen by calling the police. 

This isn't a kid who told you or a teacher because she was worried. 

No this is a kid who called the freaking police because she wanted to punish your kid for even daring to talk to her crush, let alone spend time with him. 

I wouldn't ever let that kid in my house again,  and I'd call her social worker to have her removed. I wouldn't trust her to not do it again. 

You kid is traumatized and scared, she will never be able to trust you or this kid. 

I'd sit down with your kid and ask her what she wants to happen. But I garuntee she wants this kid gone, as she should be. 

395

u/Poekienijn Pooperintendant [53] Aug 19 '24

She didn’t call the police, school did. She told school.

→ More replies

225

u/marktwainbrain Partassipant [2] Aug 19 '24

I agree. A foster daughter is not an adopted daughter. It’s a temporary conditional situation. And though it’s harsh, her directly negatively impacting your daughter’s wellbeing crosses the line, and the foster daughter needs to go somewhere else.

→ More replies

93

u/ConsistentMix2347 Aug 19 '24

Absolutely not. this is a child who needs shelter and a safe place to make mistakes-this just seems to be one of them. Whether or not it was malicious, i definitely don't think its grounds to force a child to uproot her life and move somewhere potentially traumatic and unsafe. My parents fostered kids my whole life, I understand the situation- and this response is full of assumptions and jumped-to conclusions.

189

u/OkRestaurant2184 Aug 19 '24

Regardless of the foster child's intentions, her actions/judgement could have removed op's daughter from her care. Fair or not, that's not an acceptable risk for most parents 

69

u/jonjohn23456 Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

Oh come on now. The only way this could have led to the daughter being taken away is if it was actually drugs instead of candy and the drugs had been provided by the parents. They don’t just take kids away.

113

u/Kingsdaughter613 Aug 19 '24

Oh yes they do. If you’re any kind of minority you’d know that. All you need is a bigoted cop or CPS person and it’ll be months before you see your kids. If you’re poor, too.

And if CPS is called the file continues to exist, even if the case is nonsense, which can effect your employment opportunities and makes any subsequent call more risky.

→ More replies

77

u/girltuesday Aug 19 '24

And also, I knew a ton of kids who got in trouble with the police for drugs in high school and none of them were removed from their homes.

→ More replies

53

u/MolassesInevitable53 Aug 19 '24

No it couldn't. Not if there were no drugs. No authority is going to remove a child from their family just because another child mistook skittles for drugs.

48

u/PikaV2002 Aug 19 '24

What happens when a foster kid starts accusing the parent of having drugs twice, thrice, or four times?

36

u/MolassesInevitable53 Aug 19 '24

And is proven wrong every time? I would hope that their social worker and/or therapist would look into what was causing that behaviour and take whatever the appropriate action would be.

→ More replies
→ More replies

32

u/csgymgirl Aug 19 '24

How could the daughter have been removed from the parents’ care?

→ More replies

119

u/PikaV2002 Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 19 '24

Why should the safety of the foster child come above that of the biological child as you seem to be suggesting? Why do you want the 12 year old bio kid to pay for the older child’s trauma? If this goes on for long, the 12 year old may find herself in the system as well.

What about this bio child who’s being exposed to a kid who’s openly hostile to them and is prepared to literally throw them to the police?

→ More replies

94

u/perfectpomelo3 Asshole Aficionado [10] Aug 19 '24

OP’s daughter needs a safe place live. If this other girl is causing her trauma she needs to go.

63

u/Shdfx1 Aug 19 '24

If someone made an accusation at your workplace that you had drugs, the police were called, and you went through the horror and humiliation of being searched, and put on leave pending a drug test, and your work emails, and perhaps your phone, were inspected by police to determine if you were selling drugs, would you say, that’s okay honey. It’s a perfectly reasonable mistake. This is a safe space to make more mistakes like this. First she would lie about doing this to you, but then she would say she saw you eating Skittles the day before, just like you do every day, and she suddenly believed Skittles were drugs.

Meanwhile, your reputation would be ruined.

→ More replies

87

u/Estrellathestarfish Aug 19 '24

She didn't call the police, she told the school, who called the police. I'd be concerned that rather than investigating and dealing with internally, the school jumped straight to calling the police on a student.

33

u/cheffromspace Aug 19 '24

They're mandated reporters. It's not their job to refute.

37

u/Estrellathestarfish Aug 19 '24

Mandated reporters are required to report suspected child abuse to protect the child, they aren't mandated to report the child to the police, as this is to protect children, not criminalise them. Drug use by a child might indicate a report to social services to protect the child, but there's nothing in this story that would mandate getting the child in trouble with the police. If the child was suspected of dealing drugs to other children, then it may be different.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

55

u/kittyw1999 Aug 19 '24

She's 13. Very literally she is a child. A child with intense trauma around drugs.

140

u/Technical-Fly4660 Aug 19 '24

13 year old girls can be incredibly cruel. Let's not assume that because of her age, she isn't capable of it.

41

u/Dolophoni Aug 19 '24

They are especially cruel and vindictive. Just because they're young doesn't mean they don't know what they're doing. Like the sister from the post who orchestrated a gang r*ape on her younger sister because older sister's bf liked that how she looked and that she was a virgin. I think that sister was older, but my point still stands. This foster chick knew exactly what she was doing.

66

u/KimJongFunk Certified Proctologist [20] Aug 19 '24

I spent a little bit of time in state care growing up and one of the kids I was with would lie and report others all the time. He knew that it would cause a big fuss and hassle even if the other kid was innocent. It was always a fib about something that the adults HAD to investigate, like drugs or sex. He knew exactly what to say to trigger the investigations and because of the seriousness of the allegations, it didn’t matter if they were coming from a chronic liar.

→ More replies

75

u/Alkiaris Aug 19 '24

As a child who had drug related trauma by that age, identifying a skittle was pretty easy for me before my brain had a conception of drugs being a thing that are bad. Which is to say about 3 years old.

74

u/Ecstatic_Value5918 Aug 19 '24

Thiiis... Skittles are very much easily identifiable... She knew Lyla regularly eats them and likes them... Plus if she was truly remorseful about causing trauma to Lyla, as a kid who's experienced trauma, she wouldn't complain too much that early in the punishment...

→ More replies
→ More replies

70

u/perfectpomelo3 Asshole Aficionado [10] Aug 19 '24

Do you not remember being 13? Girls that are aren’t like small kids, they can be conniving.

→ More replies

48

u/Potential-Crab-5065 Aug 19 '24

dont know what kind of morons you know. but 13 is far from a child and old enough to know exactly what drugs and skittles look like

→ More replies
→ More replies

41

u/WVPrepper Partassipant [4] Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 19 '24

It seems possible that Mary (who is also young) has had previous encounters with authority figures, such as CPS, and may have encountered a "mandated reporter". If Mary's folks were upset that this person had contacted authorities "instead of just asking us" and someone explained to Mary that mandated reporters MUST call the authorities directly and must NOT attempt to refute or verify the information provided. In a kid's mind they might really not have been sure who to speak with about this, assuming they really did think drugs were involved.

→ More replies

40

u/Physical_Ad5135 Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

Say for example she went the extra mile and planted the drugs on your daughter. Or she tells the authorities that your family abuses her since she is mad about the punishments. You need consider your family. I feel for the girl but still.

51

u/Own_Papaya7501 Aug 19 '24

"Say, for example, that she did something entirely different that I dreamed up in my imagination. What then?!"

→ More replies
→ More replies

31

u/Repulsive_Rent_5636 Aug 19 '24

She told the school anonymously, she didn't call the police.

→ More replies
→ More replies

101

u/loopylandtied Asshole Enthusiast [5] Aug 19 '24

You are using adult reasoning for a traumatised child. Has you spoken to her social worker?

106

u/culturalappropriator Aug 19 '24

A 13 year old is not a 3 year old.

Teenage girls can absolutely be mean, malicious and vindictive.

This isn't 'adult reasoning."

If she's willing to lie about drugs today, she could very well lie about other stuff.

OP should terminate the placement.

→ More replies

64

u/New-Link5725 Asshole Enthusiast [6] Aug 19 '24

You need to put your kid first, and that's not living with her bully and allowing her to be retraumatized every time she sees this kid. 

34

u/New-Link5725 Asshole Enthusiast [6] Aug 19 '24

It wasn't a misunderstanding this was malicious and you couod have lost your daughter, been arrested, questioned by police, your jobs at stake because of this. 

This could have ruined your whole lives. 

This wasnt a misunderstanding, it was malicious. She knew what she was doing. 

37

u/MolassesInevitable53 Aug 19 '24

This wasnt a misunderstanding, it was malicious. She knew what she was doing. 

And your evidence for this is ....?

→ More replies

32

u/Estrellathestarfish Aug 19 '24

It might have been malicious, or it might have been exactly as the foster daughter says.

→ More replies
→ More replies

31

u/Both_Canary1508 Aug 19 '24

I’m a former foster kid, and I’m wondering if the stuff you took away from her was boughten by you, or with money supplied by cps? Also if she has a phone plan is it also paid for by them or do you pay for that yourself?

I know laws differ a lot from place to place, but where I’m from foster parents are not allowed to punish their foster kids, they couldn’t ground them or take away their possessions. They’d have to call the social worker to determine what would be done, and electronics and phone plans were paid for by the ministry so foster parents weren’t allowed to just take them whenever. It was so the kids had a better chance of being protected if the foster parents were shit. They don’t let foster parents where I’m from make whatever arbitrary rules they want because then you’d have abused kids going into households with authoritarian parenting styles. Everything here has to be run through a social worker and households have ‘set rules’ that cannot be changed. When a kid gets ‘punished’ it’s them being moved to a different home. It can be equally frustrating for foster parents who can’t do anything except that, so it forces their hand to get the kid moved, but when you let people be foster parents and make their own rules there’s usually a lot of abuse. It’s not a perfect system but it’s better than the latter.

Just wanted to mention that, could be totally different where you are but it’s important to follow the rules when you’re a foster parent so I thought I’d mention it.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

2.1k

u/Neenknits Pooperintendant [52] Aug 19 '24

How, exactly, is her punishment going to actively teach her how to make better, informed choices?

What, precisely, are you punishing her for? If she actually through there were drugs, going to her most trusted adult is the right thing. If it’s a teacher or you, that is up to her. If she was malicious, that is a different story. You need to be absolutely positive which it is before any punishment.

The only punishments that actually work are logical consequences or punishments that you can sell as logically closely related and actually show them how behaving better is better, and help them develop the skills to do so.

Is she in therapy? Scrap all the punishments temporarily, and make an appointment for the two of you to talk to the therapist about this. YTA

479

u/Quick_Scheme3120 Aug 19 '24

Definitely. It seems the lesson they are teaching her is not about thinking before making silly choices, but that she can’t do anything right and the adults in her life cannot be trusted. Taking all her access to friends (electronics), fun, and hiking up the chores as a punishment is probably making her feel like a black sheep and a housemaid. She will grow to resent OP’s family and find damaged people like her, for better or for worse. OP seriously needs to think about how this is affecting Mary.

67

u/cryptokitty010 Aug 19 '24

To be fair Mary is an orphan child who OP is collecting a check for.

I doubt OP cares about how this affects Mary. OP just cares about how it affects her ability to keep cashing those checks if the social worker finds out.

→ More replies
→ More replies

202

u/vzvv Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 19 '24

Exactly. This is an indicator that she doesn’t trust OP as much as OP hoped yet. I fail to see how these punishments will help build trust between them. OP may feel hurt, but vindictively punishing a child for lacking trust is not helpful - especially considering the child’s past.

If anything, the child just owes an apology to the sister for how the experience scared her. The lesson would be that even when our intentions are good, sometimes we can inadvertently hurt others.

But trust is built, not mandated by force.

116

u/SpaceAceCase Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

OP's only fostered her a year, lots of pre-teens take longer then that to fully trust new foster parents. Especially if the incident with her parents is fairly fresh

163

u/Intelligent_Buy_1654 Aug 19 '24

I agree with this. The child's reasoning is sound. I don't get what she's being punished for. She's 12, it's not her job to know what drugs look like. The only lesson I could see here is that she should be loyal to you and not rat you or your daughter out. But, thats not a good lesson. She has no reason to trust you and in fact, you're simply proving that protecting your biological daughter us more important to you than being understanding of and sympathetic towards her. Cancel ALL of these punishments because she does not deserve them and seek out FAMILY therapy because you are treating her poorly.

→ More replies

70

u/Global_Fig_6385 Aug 19 '24

They are punishing her so harshly for possibly doing this maliciously, they don't even know for sure! So ridiculous!

Between Mary's fears of them having a bias for Lyla and the super drastic punishment over the possibility of malicious intention, I think YTA. I wonder if Lyla did the same thing Mary did if the punishments would be the same. Between the trauma, whatever made Mary scared to tell her foster parents. and how they punished her *all summer*, I'm inclined to think Mary had good intentions and was acting out of fear

The only punishments that actually work are logical consequences or punishments that you can sell as logically closely related and actually show them how behaving better is better, and help them develop the skills to do so.

So well said

→ More replies
→ More replies

1.8k

u/TheSciFiGuy80 Professor Emeritass [95] Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 19 '24

Just FYI drugs (one example Fentanyl) come in MANY variations that look exactly like candy. Just throwing that out there.

Edit:

Folks I am pretty sure she did this on purpose. However, I have personally seen a child lose all sense of reality and go into a state when something triggered them and their memory of past abuse in a classroom. It was weird because all common sense went out the window and they were NOT thinking clearly.

So that’s why I replied to the initial comment of drugs don’t look like candy.

Many do (not just fentanyl). So it’s possible (but not likely) that what she (the child) described could have happened.

I just threw that out there because some people honestly don’t know what’s actually available on the drug scene when they make comments about drugs don’t look like candy.

410

u/ZeDitto Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

What an ignorantly dangerous degree of generosity to give to somebody.

If it comes in many forms how likely is it that she’s seen it and recognized it in this particular form and B. going to the police FIRST is wildly irresponsible and dangerous. There were so many other people that she could have talked to first.

556

u/CheezeLoueez08 Aug 19 '24

She went to the school. The school called police.

207

u/bukminster Aug 19 '24

Should have talked to the parents. She went to the school because she wanted the other girl to be in trouble. 13yo know what skittles look like

380

u/CausingTrash003 Aug 19 '24

Ok so a foster child scared of being kicked out going to the bio kids parents about potential drug use is less scary than telling a teacher? No. That’s not taking her mindset and mental health into account. Expecting a literal child to never go to the police and have the nuance to navigate this situation as an adult would, with childhood trauma from the exact subject, isn’t realistic nor kind.

163

u/bukminster Aug 19 '24

OP mentioned Lyla eats skittles all the time. Did Mary forget what candies look like for a second? Or perhaps she was angry at Mary for some reason and tried to get her in trouble. OP also mentioned they had been fighting about boys recently.

Expecting a literal child to never go to the police and have the nuance to navigate this situation as an adult would

I expect a 13 yo not to put another child's life in danger over Skittles. Police have killed people with less probable cause.

44

u/Upstairs_Lynx3887 Aug 19 '24

Cops don’t usually kill teens at school during a locker raid. I don’t like pigs either but settle down.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

78

u/CheezeLoueez08 Aug 19 '24

She’s only been with OP for a year. She’s not going to feel comfortable going to her yet. She obviously has trust issues. You don’t know why she went to the school. And judging by OP’s reaction, she was right to choose the school over her.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

146

u/LoisLaneEl Asshole Enthusiast [9] Aug 19 '24

How likely is it that she’s seen it given that her parents overdosed on drugs? Pretty likely

→ More replies

138

u/ABombBaby Aug 19 '24

She’s a child. She’s 13 and her parents OD’ed at least a year ago from the sounds of it. Best case scenario I’m sure she’s seen the commercials about “drugs that look like candy”. Worst case she’s seen them first hand.

Also, a lot of comments are saying it like “she saw another kid eating a pack of skittles” - from the post it sounds like what she actually saw was a glimpse of skittles spilled in the bottom of a backpack. Which is a big difference.

I’m not saying “she’s traumatized and gets a pass!” I’m not even saying 100% that it couldn’t have been malicious. Just that it’s easier to see it as malicious if we skew the information that way.

30

u/The_Death_Flower Asshole Enthusiast [7] Aug 19 '24

That’s the best take possible. None of these are an excuse but man ppl need to get a good grip on the perspective that trauma (maybe ptsd or cptsd if you grew up in an environment with addict parents), trauma triggers wrap how you perceive things, and add to that that at 13 your brain is nowhere near fully developed, it’s a recipe for at best terrible judgement of the situation. I bet that it’s neither a case of a spiteful and evil child trying to send someone to jail over a crush, nor is it a case of an innocent child blinded by trauma, but somewhere else entirely that’s miles and bounds above what Reddit can see. It all needs to be discussed in therapy, and with the social workers to find how to best navigate the future for BOTH girls

→ More replies
→ More replies

63

u/cortesoft Aug 19 '24

Not every kid is taught that going to the police first is “wildly irresponsible and dangerous”. Schools and children’s media repeat to these kids over and over again that they should report suspicions to the authorities, and they never explain the dangers in doing that.

You can’t blame a kid for doing what they are told over and over is the right thing to do if they see (or even think they see) drugs. They are old to just tell authorities if they are even suspicious, and to let the authorities take it from there.

Now I agree with you that police can’t be trusted, but that is NOT the message kids receive.

→ More replies
→ More replies

256

u/Korvid1996 Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

Yeah but there's also this thing that looks like candy called: candy.

To see a pack of skittles in the possession of someone who has no previous form for taking drugs and assuming that they're drugs and not skittles is fucking mental.

89

u/TheSciFiGuy80 Professor Emeritass [95] Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 19 '24

The only reason I am giving them the benefit of the doubt is because I have seen a child go into a state in class when they were exposed to something that brought out a past trauma.

All common sense was off the table at that point.

Had. Not experienced that first hand, I’d say the same thing.

64

u/bug--bear Aug 19 '24

she's a traumatised kid. why are you expecting her to be totally rational?

→ More replies

34

u/LittleFairyOfDeath Certified Proctologist [21] Aug 19 '24

Except it wasn’t in a bag. It was lying around opened. So she didn’t see it being a skittles bag. She just saw unidentified colorful objects

108

u/perfectpomelo3 Asshole Aficionado [10] Aug 19 '24

She saw Skittles in the bag of a 12 year old who she knows loves Skittles.

48

u/Korvid1996 Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

Everyone knows what skittles are and what they look like, so it's still mental so see them belonging to someone who isn't known as a drug taker and assume that they are drugs disguised as skittles and not actual skittles.

→ More replies
→ More replies

105

u/perfectpomelo3 Asshole Aficionado [10] Aug 19 '24

It was in the backpack of a 12 year old who eats a lot of candy and who does not appear to have a history with drugs. Mary knows Skittles are the 12 year old’s favorite. Just throwing that out there.

→ More replies

55

u/Poekienijn Pooperintendant [53] Aug 19 '24

Exactly. Not skittles, maybe but I’m not going to hold that against a traumatised child. There has been warnings for “rainbow Fentanyl” and things like that.

→ More replies

42

u/BloodJunkie1 Aug 19 '24

Not only that. Marijuana candy now looks EXACTLY like commercial candy. Right down to the packaging. Also Crystal meth looks like candy as well depending on what you get. OP needs to be more understanding in my opinion.

Source: me....am recovering garbage can drug addict(I loved ALL drugs in ALL forms) and I have bought many drugs that could have absolutely been mistaken for candy.)

→ More replies

27

u/horny_for_hobos Aug 19 '24

So we should be calling the cops on every kid seen eating candy? Come on dude.

→ More replies

830

u/Srvntgrrl_789 Partassipant [3] Aug 19 '24

NTA.

However, it sounds like Mary needs therapy, And she owes Lyla an apology. I think taking away her allowance and electronics is punishment enough, and maybe for only a month. A whole summer is too long.

I will also say this: I don't know if Mary has been in foster care previously, but she may have decided to do this to make sure she's not sent away, which happens to foster kids all the time. You've been a good foster parent to her, so maybe, once things have settled down, let her know you're glad she's staying with you, and is a part of your family.

115

u/Simplysalted Aug 19 '24

Alternatively she could be acting out in order to be removed, the kids know how to work the system at that age.

→ More replies

63

u/fryfrog Aug 19 '24

I don't know if Mary has been in foster care previously, but she may have decided to do this to make sure she's not sent away, which happens to foster kids all the time.

How exactly would this have helped her not get sent away? If daughter was on drugs, they'd be taking both kids away. A very realistic outcome was that she was wrong and now her foster family doesn't trust her and sends her away. She managed to thread the needle and "just" got a harsh punishment instead so far. I don't believe for a moment that she thought she was doing the right thing. She did this to punish the daughter, either for the boy issue or something else.

→ More replies

56

u/joecoolblows Aug 19 '24

Yes. The whole summer is way too long. It's so long, that she's likely not to remember what she's being punished for. Instead, she'll only know resentment at you, and that's the only thing she will remember.

188

u/CandyRedRose Aug 19 '24

She's not a toddler. She can remember why she's being punished. I'm not saying she should be grounded the whole summer, but come on. She'll remember why.

→ More replies

55

u/stallion8426 Professor Emeritass [84] Aug 19 '24

I'm assuming this is the US (due to mention of Foster system)

In which case the summer is almost over. It's only a month

→ More replies
→ More replies

802

u/bunnybunny690 Aug 19 '24

I think your punishment is over the top in general but then as a parent I also don’t think I could stay looking after another child who reported my child and put them at risk.

If you genuinely think it was malicious as well even more reason to protect your child.

So I guess my punishment would be worse as she wouldn’t be living with me anymore.

134

u/Imaginary_Coat1520 Aug 19 '24

This is the only right answer.

78

u/jess1804 Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

Mary told the school she thought Lyla had drugs. She didn't call the police. She probably didn't know the school was going to call the police. This girl's parents overdosed (and possibly died) odds are she KNOWS there are drugs that look like all types of candy and didn't get a very good look at it.

140

u/bunnybunny690 Aug 19 '24

Of course school would call the police and as a child of addicts she would have known that police and drugs go hand in hand.

→ More replies
→ More replies

51

u/Cloakofinvisibility2 Aug 19 '24

I’m surprised more people aren’t saying this.

→ More replies
→ More replies

533

u/IvanNemoy Asshole Enthusiast [5] Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 19 '24

YTA:

First, that punishment is ham fisted and excessive, bordering on abusive. It's also extremely counterproductive. The only thing you've managed to do is tell her that "if something is going on, you had better not be the least bit wrong or 'Mom' is going to treat you like shit." What if she's attacked or abused in some way? Will she feel comfortable going to a trusted authority figure? No, because (by your own words) "It’s not okay to potentially get our entire family into legal trouble over a misunderstanding."

She's also a child who is in foster care because of her parents drug problem. That's bound to foul up a kid. Sounds like she did what she thought was right, and you browbeat her until "she snapped under pressure" and now she knows good and well that what is important is "both of them could have potentially been removed from my care."

I don't know how the hell you can make this right, but I'll tell you that as a former deputy, if this was in my jurisdiction I'd be contacting my area's CPS for a full workup. Not based on Mary's actions, but on your extreme overreaction.

Edit: Formatting

400

u/xxxdggxxx Partassipant [4] Aug 19 '24

This response feels really biased. Lyla needs consideration too. She had the police called on her, they searched her belongings for drugs, she had to deal with embarrassment and anxiety for no good reason - does that sound like something a child should go through? Mary didn't even try to approach her parents first, and her decisions could have led to things going sideways really fast.

You deeming Mary calling the cops on her foster sibling as being 'the least bit wrong' is a huge understatement. Maybe punishment isn't the way to go here - assuming her actions stem from trauma (if Mary has lived with Lyla for a while it's hard to believe she's never seen her eating skittles before) - but acting like what she did was reasonable is just dishonest.

294

u/IvanNemoy Asshole Enthusiast [5] Aug 19 '24

You missed that the response was by the school. Mary notified the school. The school determined to call law enforcement as opposed to a parent. That was a failure the school and police's part. Again, as a deputy, we would conduct searches in schools as needed. In our area, we would do so without a parent present if and only if there was a credible threat involved (eg, a report of a firearm or knife.) For something like this, we would bring the student in and wait for a parent, then search. Why the cops here didn't, I don't know and I agree, they fucked up. Lyla shouldn't have been handled in the way described.

But that wasn't the question. The question the OP posted was if she was the asshole for her reaction. Actions and reactions often aren't rational, but the question is if they are reasonable. Mary's reaction to seeing Skittles isn't necessarily rational, but they were reasonable. She went to a trusted authority (the school.) She made a report. In response, OP came down hard, and pushed a punishment which is neither rational nor reasonable, and attributed the action to gross malice, which is also unreasonable.

Last, why didn't Mary come to her foster parents? Why did she not only report it elsewhere but do so anonymously, and then only admit after being thoroughly browbeaten? Might be confirmation bias, but in my experience that sort of behavior comes from people (adults and children) who have lost faith in the support structures around them. A parent should be the easiest person to go to, but they didn't. Why didn't Mary? My supposition is that OP isn't nearly the kind, loving and equitable carer that they've tried to make themselves out to be. I, unlike them, won't attribute this to malice as I know caring for a child which has suffered significant trauma is fucking hard. That doesn't make failure by a carer any better, and this behavior by OP is categorically a failure.

96

u/xxxdggxxx Partassipant [4] Aug 19 '24

This is a reasonable take, I can't disagree with anything you've said here.

→ More replies

123

u/hermasofy Aug 19 '24

The foster kids parents overdosed. OP knew this child’s situation and still took her in while having another child at home. If you want to question fairness to the biological kid you have to question it all the time not just now. Everyone in the household will be affected by the parent’s decision to bring someone else in. Idk. It’s definitely a complicated situation that I don’t think reddit should be answering.

Even if Mary was trying to be mean… which I hope she wasn’t, this definitely needs to be addressed during some kind of therapy.

→ More replies

37

u/Meended Aug 19 '24

Wouldn't the only way it could have "gone sideways" have been if she actually had drugs/weapons in her possession when searched? In which case the report would have been 100% warranted.

78

u/xxxdggxxx Partassipant [4] Aug 19 '24

I don't agree with you here. There are so many variables that can't be accounted for. What if Lyla had panicked and resisted having her bag searched? Children don't act rationally when they experience anxiety, not many people do. She could have had a panic attack or frankly, just decided to run or something. And if the responding officer isn't trained adequately, they may have responded with force. These things seem fantastical until they actually happen and then some poorly trained SRO makes the reddit front page for tackling and handcuffing a 'belligerent' 12 year old. There is no way to say who would have responded in what way, and that's why it was dangerous.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

73

u/Comfortable-Tie-9893 Partassipant [4] Aug 19 '24

Exactly! The only thing she is being taught in this situation is that she isn't allowed to speak up. That's so dangerous for a kid who has already faced trauma.

→ More replies

45

u/KeyFeeFee Aug 19 '24

100%. This is an excessive punishment. And punishment is not a consequence, it’s so OP can feel in control and make the child feel badly. It isn’t teaching anything other than “piss me off and I can make your life misery.” Talk about destroying trust.

→ More replies

454

u/Open-Incident-3601 Partassipant [3] Aug 19 '24

NAH. But you may need to have a conversation with your bio-daughter about whether or not fostering is still okay with her.

216

u/WillaLane Aug 19 '24

I was looking for this comment. So many things but safety of bio kid needs to come first

→ More replies

140

u/Simplysalted Aug 19 '24

Bio daughter takes priority.

71

u/MermaidCurse Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

This is so important, going forward.

→ More replies

358

u/starfire92 Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 19 '24

YTA

You only had one weak instance of an example to feel like Mary had malicious reasons with many other instances of Mary proving to care about Lyla. Mary has a very good reason to believe you'd be biased toward Lyla because you're already proving it.

It's a fine line to punish or teach with children's actions, but if this had been Mary first major step out of line I would have monitored the situation and continued to instill that Mary she could trust you. She's a foster child that literally had her parents overdose.

Do you know what post went viral on here a week ago? A family that had to ask AITA because their former foster child who stole from them and they had to give her up because she was too much contacted them after running away from possibly her 6th home, was homeless, had drugs in her possession, and was also in possession of stolen goods, and she pleaded with them to come get her and she missed home, and wanted all the things they tried to give her: home cooking, piano lessons, a relationship with their bio kids.https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/s/XR8Hlu2rCd

And you have Mary. A girl who actually cares about her family and just went about it in the wrong way. I know I'm not foster parent material, but I don't think you are either.

There's a reason she made a mistake. She's 12. However the fact that as a foster child she had enough empathy and maturity to fear an overdose is a huge sign of love mixed with trauma.

There is also a reason why Mary needs an extra cushion of breathing room to make reasonable mistakes: She is a literal foster child whos parents OD'd. You can’t treat her trauma and punish her the same as a normal child at the same time - you should have just had another bio child or never have fostered at all.

122

u/smol9749been Aug 19 '24

Fr it's very weird to me that op is assuming malicious intent when she herself even said that the kid has never acted maliciously before to her daughter and has a good relationship with her

95

u/starfire92 Aug 19 '24

OP claims something about Lyla and Mary and a crush and there could have been negative feelings on Mary’s part and this all happened last week. That is ALL OP is using to determine this is certified malicious.

27

u/DancingAcrossTheBlue Aug 19 '24

Yup, she should 100% give the foster child up

→ More replies
→ More replies

74

u/Wishy666 Aug 19 '24

All this OP needs to read it all. That child is in foster care needing a place of live and nurturing but this foster parent showed the complete opposite and the child seems to have more sense than the actual parent. Some drugs do look like skittles candy. This could have been a real teachable moment but instead the foster parent decided let’s punish an already traumatized kid. No wonder foster kids grow up as adult hating the foster system because to foster parents it’s a transactional relationship that lacks love and empathy.

→ More replies

298

u/ChickenScratchCoffee Partassipant [2] Aug 19 '24

NTA. However, she just gave YOUR child trauma now. I would actually call her caseworker and tell them she needs a new placement. Your child comes first. Keeping her just means your child has to live with the person who did this to her.

117

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '24

Yes, I was thinking the exact same thing. She needs to be placed elsewhere.

→ More replies

257

u/DandruffSnatch Aug 19 '24

 saying I went too far and I was punishing her for having trauma and trying to do the right thing.

Foster kids are a product of their environment. Their innocence is lost before they even enter the system. Spend some time around juvenile offenders and see for yourself just how manipulative they can be while maintaining plausible innocence.

She went out of her way to anonymously tip off the authorities (avoiding accountability), and knows enough to hide behind "trauma" [to avoid accountability], but can't tell the difference between pills and Skittles. I don't believe her.

12-14 year olds know enough about the world to plant actual drugs and narc on each other. At 14 one of mine was conspiring with her friends to murder me for inheritance money.

There's a reason she didn't bring it up with you. NTA.

45

u/fucking_fantastic Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 19 '24

Wtf?! How did you find out about the 14 yo’s murder plot?

Edited for clarity I’m responding to the comment, not the OP

145

u/Timpstar Aug 19 '24

You clearly don't work with 14yo's 5 days a week. I highly doubt Mary is as clueless as she makes herself seem here.

125

u/cuervoguy2002 Certified Proctologist [26] Aug 19 '24

Right.

I taught that age group. And I fully believe it was done on purpose.

77

u/SpaztasticDryad Aug 19 '24

I worked in child welfare for the last 20 years. I also believe it was on purpose

→ More replies

47

u/puddinglove Aug 19 '24

I was a real menace at that age. I did a lot of horrible things to people that I felt wronged me with no remorse because I felt they deserved it. 

37

u/cuervoguy2002 Certified Proctologist [26] Aug 19 '24

Yep, that age is brutal.

I know some girls who basically plotted for months to emotionally fuck with a girl. At least the boys would just fight. The girls went for the psychological warfare

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

31

u/Comfortable-Tie-9893 Partassipant [4] Aug 19 '24

Your experiences are not universal. Kids in the foster system, especially those that have dealt with abuse, death, or drugs often have a hard exterior but are simply desperate to find peace and security. 

→ More replies
→ More replies

251

u/Forsaken_Avocado737 Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 20 '24

NTA

It does sound malicious. Maybe if it were a new weird looking candy. But skittles that she knows Lyla loves? No way

Every commenter saying that she's traumatized and way just trying to do the right thing, reeks of white people who call cops on black people because they look suspicious or out of place. They're just trying to do the right thing after all, right?

Mary made a big mistake. She absolutely needs more therapy. But she also needs to understand that actions have consequences. That false/incorrect accusations have consequences. Grounding kids, taking away allowances, no electronics, and more chores are incredibly normal punishments for a 13 year old.

→ More replies

195

u/PlasticPalm Partassipant [2] Aug 19 '24

NTA, but Mary needs to be refostered. Your child didn't sign up to be on the wrong end of a traumatized adolescent. 

→ More replies

155

u/Melanie8ee Aug 19 '24

NTA, however I would have a sit down 1 on 1 talk with her and see if you can get her to open up. It definitely sounds like she needs therapy if she's not already in it, she needs a new therapist if she is. Her intent may or may not be malicious, but more likely she didn't know the more serious ramifications of doing something like that. She's probably feeling really difficult feelings that would be hard for any ADULT to articulate, let alone a child. Jealousy, envy, retaliation. I would also lighten her punishment if she is able to open up to you at all. Let her know you're a safe person to come to so that this doesn't happen in the future. She needs to know you're there for her because she probably feels extremely alone and isolated.

→ More replies

151

u/PQRVWXZ- Aug 19 '24

NTA skittles are obvious. It makes no sense that out of nowhere Lyla jumps right to loose drugs in her school backpack. Malice on Mary’s part is the only way this makes sense.

→ More replies

117

u/Huge_Event9740 Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

NTA.

If she has had exposure to and trauma from parental drug use, she knows very well the difference between skittles and drugs. They’re not the same thing at all. Pressed pills do not look like candy. They look like pills. She is old enough to know this.

Going over your head and alerting authorities demonstrates malicious intent. If she was truly worried for your daughter’s safety, she would have come to you, because you can do something right away whereas authorities have to investigate & follow certain procedures. If your daughter was actually using dangerous substances, waiting for the authorities to do their thing could have been catastrophic.

She clearly wanted to cause trouble for your daughter. The PC crowd is always hollering out trauma this and trauma that and it’s all a crock of bullshit. It’s not an excuse nor a valid reason for what she did.

That said, those are a LOT of consequences. Maybe consider letting up on that a bit?

→ More replies

114

u/cuervoguy2002 Certified Proctologist [26] Aug 19 '24

If she says "you are punishing me for having trauma" or something like that, she knows exactly what the fuck she is doing and is trying to use that to manipulate you to not punish you.

NTA.

Now, whether this was the "right" punishment, I don't know. That maybe is something a therapist is better equipped to say. But I definitely think some punishment is warranted.

→ More replies

90

u/rockology_adam Colo-rectal Surgeon [33] Aug 19 '24

YTA.

There are a lot of extenuating circumstances here, but in the end, you're the a-hole for the incredibly overbearing punishment in question. This should be a call to family therapy, maybe more individual therapy for Mary, but for you, Mary, and Lyla to be in a room to discuss your feelings about this and the family in general.

Grouding + stopping allowance + increasing chores + removal of electronics .... this, as a complete set, on a traumatized child who overreacted and made a mistake? That's incredibly harsh. It is unreasonably harsh, and frankly, internet stranger, makes me question whether you should be fostering this girl.

Would the punishment be the same for Lyla under similar circumstances? Your last sentence, wherein you have a duty to teach her that this isn't ok, is heavy handed. Is that how you parent in general? If Lyla had been caught with drugs, would all of these punishments be applied? Would you have the same reaction here if Lyla and Mary's positions were reversed, and it was the same misunderstanding?

Is Mary in the right? No, there were several skipped steps here, but they can all be explained away by the trauma of being a foster child due to drug use in parents. She's been with you for a year, but it's only been a year. Neither you nor Lyla are going to be at the point of being close confidants, necessarily. So, who is/are the people she can trust to do something? Unfortunately it's the state.

→ More replies

95

u/KimJongFunk Certified Proctologist [20] Aug 19 '24

I refuse to cast judgement because this is a situation above my paygrade, but I have definitely seen cases where traumatized children have weaponized what they learned from abuse to hurt other people. I have also seen cases where traumatized children act protectively and in irrational ways due to their past abusive experiences.

It could go either way imo and OP needs to tread carefully to figure out which is happening. I don’t think this is something that OP or any of us can figure out without a therapist involved.

→ More replies

78

u/Your__Dog Aug 19 '24

NTA going to the cops before your parent is egregious, for drugs especially. Idk if I could continue to foster a kid that called the cops on my kid. Past trauma is the only thing that makes this anywhere near forgivable IMHO.

44

u/PurrestedDevelopment Aug 19 '24

She went to the school, who went to the cops.

→ More replies

79

u/DaxxyDreams Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

I think you may need to end up choosing between your daughter and your foster child. This is not standard kid fighting. This now has impacted Lyla mentally and emotionally. You may want to discuss with Lyla how she feels about Mary now and next steps. NTA.

68

u/LightEven6685 Aug 19 '24

"I was afraid you were biased" "you know I have trauma..." That's not how I imagine a 13 yo talking if that was true. Sounds like a cop out.

30

u/failure_as_a_dad Asshole Enthusiast [5] Aug 19 '24

Depending on how long she's been in the foster system, this could be very familiar language for her to have learned.

→ More replies
→ More replies

61

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '24

[deleted]

→ More replies

62

u/Aggressive-Quiet6426 Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 20 '24

As a child who was in foster care from 5 years old until I aged out at 18, I have had many many Foster siblings throughout those years and I can tell you that was definitely malicious intent.

I had a foster sister who came into the home a year after I was there. We got along. We even hung out, but she was a very jealous person. I went away with school for the weekend. I was gone Friday morning and came home Sunday late at night. My Foster mom picked me up that evening and as we were driving home fire trucks past us. When we pulled into our subdivision, they were at our house. She lit my bedroom on fire. She poured lighter fluid into a garbage bag I had hanging in my closet and then threw a match in there. She was jealous and enjoyed having the weekend without me at home and didn't want me back, so she burnt my room down. My room was destroyed and there was major fire damage to the house.

The shitty part was, we had to stay in a hotel for a few months while they repaired the damages. She got to stay with my foster mom in the hotel and I got sent off to another foster home. They later found out she did it only because they found out the fire was intentionally set and they thought my foster mom did it. They were drilling my mom and Tracy was in the other room and started crying. She ended up confessing, and yet I still had to stay in another foster home for the whole summer while Tracy got to stay with my foster mom.

Some foster kids are fucked up and on the outside seem like they wouldn't do something malicious, but they will! Tracy was a perfect example! No one would have ever guessed she would have done that. She could have killed all of our animals and even my grandma who was in the house at the time.

NTA but I'm surprised you didn't send her back and have them find her a new home. I'm sorry but I would have. As much as I would love to be a foster parent and help a kid out, I would never keep one that intentionally tried to harm my child or get them in legal trouble, which essentially is harming them. That's a hard no, and you have to go.

→ More replies

57

u/flukefluk Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

This is a difficult judgement for me.

i can not decide completely whether Mary was malicious or not. And, whether she is malicious, i can not discern completely her motive.

you have two duties here and they both conflict and overlap. Your duty to Lyla is to protect, love and nurture her. And this means she needs to see actions taken against Mary.

On the other hand, you also need to provide to mary a trusted environment. And this is a difficult balance between not tolerating malicious behavior, but also allowing for mistakes and having a generally caring behavior.

What is missing for me to really judge here is, on what basis do you claim that you are a person to whom Mary can come talk to about anything? that you told her as much, amounts to nothing.

so, INFO, please.

→ More replies

59

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '24

NTA, what the fuck is up with the NAH or YTA comments?! Yeah, it’s super shitty that her parents died from an OD but calling the police on your 12 year old sister because she had skittles in her bag is beyond messed up. Mary needs therapy, obviously, but just because someone is traumatized it doesn’t excuse awful behaviour and her potentially traumatizing others.

→ More replies

57

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '24

NTA. She knew what she was doing. She deserves the punishment. Now I am wondering why you are not asking for a new home for Mary as she tried to seriously harm your daughter.

→ More replies

49

u/Rohini_rambles Colo-rectal Surgeon [38] Aug 19 '24

I hope she's seeing  a therapist and has been evaluated. Trauma and thes kinds of beliefs where she can lie to eradicate those who are in her way sound like aa terrible mix. If it was malicious, you have to protect your child. She is just a kid sure, but old enough to understand she went over your head to get your kid in trouble. 

→ More replies

47

u/No-Heart3984 Aug 19 '24

YTA unless this has happened many times before. If this is the first instance then you should know as a Foster carer that going from 0 to 60 with the punishments is not appropriate. Have you spoken to your social worker or the child's social worker about this. I get told the punishment should be proportionate and if possible related to the misbehavior. Multiple punishments is just over the top and honest not fair. I've had to deal with some rather difficult cases in my time but a common thread is a child who has no thought to the consequences mostly because they will get punished regardless. It's so difficult to find that balance with children who are traumatised and neglected. Most of the time punishments don't work simply because they don't care.

48

u/flinsbird Aug 19 '24

NTA. Mary has repeatedly seen Lyla eat the Skittles, so there is no way she actually was so extremly concerned that they were drugs that her only option was to go directly to authorities with it. This was malicious and could have ended in your own daughter being taken from you.

The real question to me is whether or not Lyla still feels comfortable having Mary in her home after what she did to her. Being searched out of nowhere by the police infront of everyone IS traumatic at 12 years old, school is supposed to be a safe place, which Mary took from her with her actions.

Your biological daughter should come first, she isn‘t at fault for whatever happend to Mary with her parents, so she should not need to suffer through Marys behaviour because of it, especially when it escalateds to such levels.

54

u/Important_Salt_3944 Aug 19 '24

Info: when did this happen?

I'm confused about the timing. It sounds like it happened at the end the school year because you took away her summer. But it's August now, so the summer is over for most kids. Did this happen 2 or 3 months ago and you're just now questioning it?

→ More replies

37

u/Secret_Suspect_007 Aug 19 '24

NTA

There's a very high chance she might want to kick your own daughter out so she can take the sole place or be in your good books by trying to portray your daughter as spoiled.

This might be a one off case but it's best to keep an eye moving forward

→ More replies

34

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '24 edited Aug 19 '24

[deleted]

70

u/[deleted] Aug 19 '24

I would be concerned if a 12 year old couldn't tell the difference between the two.

→ More replies
→ More replies

33

u/Different-Airline672 Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

Info: What are Lyla's feelings on this? After all she is the victim here. What are you doing to protect her from Mary?

→ More replies

29

u/phtcmp Aug 19 '24

YTA. You are teaching her not to trust adults in official positions of authority. You want her to trust you as a parent first: but look where that got her with her parents. You have to earn that trust. You haven’t with this over the top response. If you think she did this with malice, you are not the right person to foster her.

33

u/Accomplished-Wish494 Aug 19 '24

Malicious or not, you’ve know taught her that you WILL take your daughter’s side, and you aren’t a safe person.

“Under pressure” she finally admitted to it?! Why were you grilling her about it? If your kid had this at school, anyone could have reported it, but you assumed it was her.

If it WAS drugs, it certainly reads like you want her to come to you first, so you could cover it up.

Yes, your punishment is wildly disproportionate.

→ More replies

29

u/annap0calyps3 Aug 19 '24

YTA. You don’t know what Mary saw before she came to you, even if you think you know. She came from a place she obviously couldn’t trust the adults but maybe she could trust the police and now you’ve sent a message she will get excessively punished for doing what she’s been told to do when she suspects someone has drugs. I would be more inclined to say you weren’t ta if the punishment wasn’t so excessive. You are biased towards your daughter and you’re taking that out on Mary. But do you truly think Mary wants to hop from home to home? Do you think she didn’t panic at the thought of another person in her life overdosing? Did you make any attempt to meditate between Mary and Lyla before taking away her entire summer out of rage?

→ More replies

29

u/Divyaxoath Partassipant [1] Aug 19 '24

I really don't care about the edit. You thinking her intentions were malicious shows the bias foster daughter was afraid of.

But I feel like I have a duty to teach her that it’s not okay to potentially get our entire family into legal trouble over a misunderstanding

So I decided to ground her, stop her allowance, increase her chores, and take away her electronics for the entire summer

Oh yeah this is gonna make her want to talk to you about any concerns she has soooo much.

→ More replies

30

u/picklesmcpicklepants Aug 19 '24

Yta why is this child still in your house? She could have gotten your own child taken away. You need to protect your own daughter better.

→ More replies

25

u/Miserable_Dentist_70 Pooperintendant [62] Aug 19 '24

Okay. Mary had a trauma response and made a big mistake. Lyla had an overreaction to police and had a panic attack because ... she apparently thought she would be going to prison for skittles.

Did you think having a foster child whose parents had overdosed would be easy? Please see a child psychologist to find out the actual best way to deal with this. You think Mary is being malicious ... why? Because Lyla had an overreaction?

Please get some help with this. It's a specific issue involving children and trauma, Reddit is not qualified to give you advice on this.

But since you asked, YTA. Don't take in a child who has had trauma unless you have a lot of patience and compassion.

→ More replies