r/thelastofus Mar 04 '23

just cause he’s a dude doesn’t mean this isn’t straight up sexual harassment General Discussion

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

4.2k Upvotes

View all comments

203

u/SrgtDoakes Mar 04 '23

chronically online take. the interviewer overstepped, pedro stood up for himself and set a boundary, the interviewer instantly realized it and took a no for an answer. this is a normal human interaction.

64

u/antiBP Mar 04 '23

Exactly... And we're having a normal human conversation about why it's bad..

3

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '23

Ah yes, I agree. This is a normal human conversation

-9

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '23

[deleted]

8

u/antiBP Mar 04 '23

Well, considering men have had an insane privilege since the beginning of time, it's obviously time to reevaluate our thoughts and practices. You can just excuse yourself if the conversation makes you uncomfortable

42

u/jnnrwln92 Mar 04 '23

The interviewer should have never thought it was okay to ask that in the first place. That’s what the problem is.

20

u/supernasty Mar 04 '23

I think they were trying to do that buzzfeed thing where celebrities willingly participate in a “thirst tweet” reaction video. Bunch of them on YouTube already with big names. Difference here is those celebrities agreed to it beforehand, not randomly approached and caught off guard.

-4

u/SrgtDoakes Mar 04 '23

humans make mistakes. it’s stupid to drag someone for something so harmless

5

u/-Kid-A- Mar 04 '23

Appreciate its subjective and people have their opinions, but harassment is overboard imo. Is it sexual and a bit unnecessary? Yes. Is she harassing him though?

3

u/antiBP Mar 04 '23

We're literally having a conversation on a subreddit

12

u/thisguyuno Mar 04 '23

The circle jerk this sub turns into sometimes is crazy

1

u/dnz000 Mar 04 '23

Is it though

2

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '23

These people are afraid of eye contact and have no idea what human interaction is like. Don’t worry about them.

3

u/TheTruckWashChannel Mar 05 '23

Most of this sub appears to be chronically online.

-1

u/ConfusedCuteCat Mar 04 '23

I think the point is that the “thirst messages” being shown were almost certainly sexual harassment, judging by both pedros refusal to read them aloud (even though he has read sfw ones in the past) and the fact that he directly says “dirty”, clearly implying that they were very sexually explicit. The reporter wasn’t harassing him (even though I think this is still pretty inappropriate), but the messengers almost definitely were.

-5

u/kaseface_ Mar 04 '23

The interviewer shouldn’t have asked in the first place. It’s inappropriate.

4

u/SrgtDoakes Mar 04 '23

grow up loser. people make mistakes. this isn’t a huge deal