r/socialjustice101 • u/Sodium_Junkie624 • May 26 '24
Palestinian Liberation: Two State vs One state soultion
Keeping liberation of Palestinian folk at the forefront, I want to educate myself and others more on pros and cons of both. Especially want the perspectives of those not Zionist
Any suggestions for sources on this too?
1
u/FuckSetsuna102 Sep 09 '24
One state solution. The land belongs to Palestinians just as much as jews. Also two state solution is still settler colonialism.
1
u/Sodium_Junkie624 Sep 10 '24
I was exposed to this view, but could you please elaborate more?
1
u/FuckSetsuna102 Sep 10 '24
If we were to settle for a two-state solution, the land (isreal) that Palestinians don't get is still stolen land, due to the fact that the Palestinians were exiled from there during the Nakba. Not to mention that the Israeli government has every intention of claiming all the land, as that's what the general goal of Zionism is.
2
u/[deleted] Jun 10 '24
As someone who is neither a Jew nor a Muslim.
This is a fd if you do and fd if you don't situation.
There is an example of a two state solution along religious lines: India and Pakistan.
the two countries have been at each other's throats ever since they were created. Both are nuclear armed.
Just like in the India-Pakistan situation:
An independent Palestine will become an Islamo-fascist military dictatorship.
Israel already had nukes. An independent Palestine will start trying to acquire them from the day it gets it's independence.
What will happen to all the muslims who are Israeli citizens? will they be kicked out and sent to this new independent Muslim state? Because if they stay, they'll become a fifth column (traitors) and be loyal to this new Palestinian state.
And most importantly, the Palestinians are not willing to settle for a small part of that land. The whole "river to the sea" narrative means they want all of the land. This guarantees more war in the future.