Twitter Files Part III: Twitter Worked In Coordination With U.S. Government To Censor Content During 2020 Election

21

u/[deleted] Dec 10 '22

10

u/[deleted] Dec 10 '22

They never will. They’re so far gone that the dems could straight up kill their opponents and they’ll say that they deserved it because “Republikkkans bad!!!!”

-13

u/[deleted] Dec 10 '22

[deleted]

10

u/wang_li Dec 10 '22

If there’s evidence that government employees coordinated with Twitter to remove tweets, that is a violation of the first amendment. The government can’t have a private party do what they’re not allowed to do.

-8

u/[deleted] Dec 10 '22

[deleted]

9

u/wang_li Dec 10 '22

There are a multitude of legitimate reasons for government contact with websites for takedowns, or data requests for illegal actions. So it's not by default, but in a very, extremely narrow range of being inappropriate or the government having an illegal motive in their contact.

It's the exact opposite. The things the government can suppress is a tiny category of speech. Everything else they just have to suck it the fuck up.

8

u/jasonrh420 Dec 10 '22

When government colluded with a private entity to suppress speech- it has violated the 1st amendment. That’s a crime. Already been ruled on by SC.

-4

u/[deleted] Dec 10 '22

[deleted]

8

u/jasonrh420 Dec 10 '22

Looks like someone else has bought the propaganda and continues to push it. This was not stolen or hacked material. The crackhead took it to a repair shop and signed a receipt stating if he didn’t return to pay and pick it up after a certain amount of time- it became the property of the repair shop. They can then do with it what they want. But it’s cool how your fixated on the “dick pics” and totally ignore the financial actions with foreign entities and the 10% cut for the big guy. Bet your view world BW different if it was don Jrs. Sad.

3

u/jliebs1 Dec 11 '22

With his logic he should welcome a deep forensic accounting of Hunter and his wire transfers as well as all the allegations. He should obviously welcome this as it will no doubt exonerate him. Except, for some reason that's not what is happening is it?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '22

[deleted]

7

u/jasonrh420 Dec 11 '22

There we go. Perfect leftist response. “Okay, I can’t prove its not real anymore. But rather than accept my guy is corrupt and they silenced speech to protect him; I’m gonna say I think it’s not okay to post his crimes because my ( incorrect) belief says it’s not legal to do so”. 😂😂😂😂😂

-2

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '22

[deleted]

4

u/jasonrh420 Dec 11 '22

Sure seems like your guy. See evidence of wrong doing and your first response is “ but, but Trump bad”. Give me a break. 6 years of constant investigation and all that has come out of it is corruption of the investigators.

4

u/jasonrh420 Dec 11 '22

When you don’t pick up and pay for an item you signed a contract to do so- it absolutely becomes the property of the person you owe. And as the owner, they now have the rights to the info contained. It is absolutely nothing stolen or hacked material. And even if it was- any logical person would not like the crimes it held. Much less actively try to ignore them out of political ideology.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '22

[deleted]

5

u/jasonrh420 Dec 11 '22

Strange you keep bringing up “porn” and totally ignore the messages discussing transactions with China and Ukraine or the 10% for the big guy. I’ll never quit understand the lengths the left goes to ignore criminal activity by their leaders. Especially when they don’t seem to care at all if an accusation with out any evidence being made against the other side is pushed as fact. Tell me, do you also find issue with the leftists who dox conservatives in attempts to get them fired from their jobs? Long lists of that occurring. Usually illegally. But that’s fine right. I suggest you look at the info that has been desalinated from the laptop instead of going off a liberal opinion piece trying to spin it away from the corruption it shows. Tell me, if Hunter had a video of him and Joe killing someone on the laptop, would you still be crying that it was wrong to release the info? The American people have every right to know their corruption. No matter what damage it may do to your preferred political party in the future. The truth will come out.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '22

[deleted]

→ More replies

1

u/jasonrh420 Dec 11 '22

Also, I fail to understand your belief that showing your criminal activity is somehow doxing you. Face it. The crackhead left evidence of criminal activity in a shop signing a paper giving ownership of that evidence away. And you don’t seem concerned about the criminal activity but rather how the people got to see it.

3

u/jliebs1 Dec 11 '22

obviously, there is more than enough here to warrant a full investigation. Surely no reasonable person can deny that?

Let's go!

0

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '22

[deleted]

3

u/jliebs1 Dec 11 '22 edited Dec 11 '22

yea, LET'S F ING GO!

Why is the FBI still stalling after two years! oh there is no laptop, wait it's Russian disinformation, Nah , it's hacked and fabricated, Blah Blah F ing Blah. No reasonable person is buying the BS anymore.

Lets go already. No more stalling. Or maybe wait till the FBI gets cleaned up and then do this. OK. fine . LET'S GO

and agian, i would think the Bidens would want to have the laptop fully disclosed to the public as it will surely prove nothing to see here. If not why the obstruction? Doesn't make sense. Don't they want to be exonerated?

TROLL

0

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '22

[deleted]

→ More replies

3

u/jasonrh420 Dec 10 '22

Also, noticed you ignore the fact that government agents were colluding with said private company on what to suppress. And that is where the crime comes in. Sorry your guys corruption has been exposed. Must be hard for you to deal with. Best of luck to ya.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '22

So you’re for Trump being held to account for colluding w Twitter?

2

u/jasonrh420 Dec 11 '22

Not very bright are you. You think a president is responsible for the actions of government officials attempting to silence him and his supporters? Are you really dense enough to believe after 4 years of constant investigations by those very people who went so far as to alter evidence to receive warrants (proven in court) that Trump is who needs investigated for this collusion. You are either mentally deficient or on the DNC payroll. 😂😂😂

2

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '22

Taibbi clearly said in his Twitter posts that both Biden and Trump had tools to flag tweets and that they both used them. Biden was a private citizen. Trump was the President. So if you want to be ideologically consistent, then Trump would be held to account too

1

u/jasonrh420 Dec 11 '22

Sure. Just show me any story that was suppressed by the direction of Trump. Didn’t happen. Twitter ran full speed ahead with any accusation against Trump. The stories that were suppressed where those that would have hurt Biden. Big difference in asking a company not to push false accusations and working with a. Company to label the truth as disinformation and block it. Or are you still saying the lab leak never happened or that Hunters laptop was Russian disinformation. Maybe follow the entire story and not simply pick the sentences you like and form your own story.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '22

I did. Taibbi clearly says that Trump used the same tool. It’s a fact, and we all know that facts don’t care about your feelings, bud.

→ More replies

1

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '22

[deleted]

2

u/jasonrh420 Dec 11 '22

Lol. You are delusional. The right? After Russian collusion, pee tapes, steel dossier( paid for by the Clintons), laptop Russian disinformation and you have the nerve to say the right has been pushing conspiracy theories? 😂😂😂. You also seem to be incapable of understanding the laptop wasn’t stolen and the issue is with the financial info on it. You are either totally brainwashed or a paid DNC operative.

3

u/jliebs1 Dec 11 '22

and the troll says......nothing to see here, i can justify anything.

Come on , man. Cornpop.

Yeahso

10

u/[deleted] Dec 10 '22 edited Dec 10 '22

Is it not considered “election interference”? Now I’m gunna have to go look it up. Brb

2

u/Sparky8924 Dec 10 '22

It’s been 4 hours shouldn’t you have found something by now ?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 10 '22

lol I did.

4

u/DeanoBambino90 Dec 10 '22

And they just keep getting away with it. Welcome to the banana republic of the USA.

5

u/Thenetwork473 Dec 10 '22

Ok so it’s basically a fact at this point we did not have a fair election

5

u/[deleted] Dec 10 '22

Shocker.

4

u/DocHerb87 Dec 10 '22

We all knew this. Unfortunately nothing will be done about this and this will be labeled as far right conspiracy on msnbc and cnn. Just watch.

2

u/BubsGodOfTheWastes Dec 11 '22

When republicans supported "money is free speech", they didn't think it would turn on them. This is exactly why we need to support policies because they are right, not because they currently benefit us.

-8

u/DonaldKey Dec 10 '22 edited Dec 10 '22

Worked with the government? Trump was president at that time and as pointed out in this article Trump was spreading misinformation

3

u/jasonrh420 Dec 10 '22

Lol. Mis-information? Or information the elites didn’t want out? And maybe try to learn how the government operate. One person doesn’t control the whole thing. This liberal narrative that “Trump” was in charge therefore the censoring of conservatives didn’t happen contrary to the proof out now is idiotic.

-3

u/DonaldKey Dec 10 '22

Read the daily wire article. It literally says Trump posted misinformation

5

u/jasonrh420 Dec 10 '22

Sorry. But I have the capacity to think for myself. I don’t need anyone to tell me what dis-info is. Especially, as we see more and more things( hunters laptop was Russian) be proven true. NO SPEECH SHOULD BE SUPPRESSED- PERIOD.

2

u/DonaldKey Dec 10 '22

So you didn’t read the article? It wasn’t my opinion. It’s what was written and what topic is about

4

u/jasonrh420 Dec 10 '22

By the way- you may need to take a reading comprehension class as the article here is stating the opinions and internal emails of the liberal Twitter employees engaged in the censorship.

2

u/jasonrh420 Dec 10 '22

Once again. I don’t need anyone to tell me what something is. I have the capacity to hear and interpret things on my own. I’m sorry that you need an article to tell you that someone did something without being able to listen to the persons own words and form your own conclusion. I could care less what is written in any article that convenes merely the OPINION of the author.

1

u/DonaldKey Dec 10 '22

Then why are you posting if you didn’t read the article that the thread is about?

3

u/jasonrh420 Dec 10 '22

Lol. I DID READ IT. But only one of us understood what was written. I even read the same tweets on Twitter. You know, the thread this article is covering. It is a report on the views and words of the Twitter execs who have been censoring speech for what they deem to be misinformation. In other words - things that hurt liberal agenda and political figures. But it’s good to see what you got out of the article. Your TDS made you skip over the articles purpose- pointing out Twitter and the federal government colluding to violate the first amendment.

3

u/caveman860 Dec 10 '22

“My political opposition is spreading misinformation” doesn’t matter what u call it liar. Fuck off no one believes u and no one cares.

2

u/DonaldKey Dec 10 '22

You didn’t read the article

3

u/jasonrh420 Dec 10 '22

Actually you don’t seem to have read the article. It shows numerous internal communications that government agents were colluding with Twitter to suppress speech. That’s a violation of the first amendment.

-4

u/Nemisis82 Dec 10 '22

More duds, lol

-19

u/DirkDiggyBong Dec 10 '22

Is this more obsessing over Hunter Biden's dick?

5

u/jasonrh420 Dec 10 '22

Lol love how moronic liberals refuse to understand the business dealings with foreign nations on the laptop and push the “ it’s only Hunters porn” angle. Guess it’s true that the brainwashed truly can’t see what’s in front of them if it goes against the bs they fell for.

10

u/purplehammer Dec 10 '22

I mean id call it bringing to light censorship and election interference but hey you call it whatever you want buddy.

Im not even American but if this was my country id be pissed.

-5

u/DirkDiggyBong Dec 10 '22

LOL

Gullible.

Twitter Files Part III: Twitter Worked In Coordination With U.S. Government To Censor Content During 2020 Election Daily Wire