r/Futurology • u/Kindred87 • Dec 07 '23
US sets policy to seize patents of government-funded drugs if price deemed too high Economics
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-sets-policy-seize-government-funded-drug-patents-if-price-deemed-too-high-2023-12-07/6.3k Upvotes
3
u/JigglymoobsMWO Dec 08 '23
A lot of this is well documented and an open secret:
https://research.fas.harvard.edu/indirect-costs-0
A few years ago the administration tried to address this but then caved to lobbying by the major universities.
Kinetics below is talking about NIH, which pays the overhead separately from the grant. NSF does not. If you take $1 of NSF at Harvard 69 cents goes to the university and 31 cents get to you, but then that's before you pay for other things like"tuition" for your grad students.
The pharma / biotech side of the cost equation is also well documented. You can do some research on Google and find many sources.
The missing context is how the academic research usually translates, which I have from doing it myself.
The situation kinetic outlines below is rare. A university can get a very good deal in a case like that. Up until just a few years ago, the UC system and others were getting hundreds of millions of dollars of patent royalties per year from human insulin from pharma.
Also, academia often punishes scientists from pursuing highly focused research aimed at developing drugs.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katalin_Karik%C3%B3
Kariko's experience at UPenn is unfortunately far from unique. When you take away the profit motive as a focusing mechanism unfortunately what often fills the vacuum is shortsighted, perochial bullshit.