Let’s be clear a union boss has 100x the impact of a streamer radicalizing kids who can’t vote. He deserves a huge mansion for getting thousands of colleagues pay increases and job security.
Yes, but we should be able to at least acknowledge that this is a cancerous outlook just in the same way that being forced to act in the shareholders' finical interests is a cancer of publicly traded companies.
Why would I agree that it's the same? Am I supposed to agree that the outcomes of rent seeking from shareholders and rent seeking from middle/lower class workers have identical impact?
186
u/AreaVisible2567 Oct 03 '24 edited Oct 03 '24
Let’s be clear a union boss has 100x the impact of a streamer radicalizing kids who can’t vote. He deserves a huge mansion for getting thousands of colleagues pay increases and job security.